Slavery’s sojourners: the trans-Atlantic crossing of William and Ellen Craft (1850 – 1869)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The passage of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 in the United States made even the free territory of the northern states unsafe for escaped slaves. Slaves could be captured and returned to the South at any time without benefit of trial. By late September of 1850 America was no longer a place where any black person could live safely. William and Ellen Craft were two such slaves, who chose – with the help of Trans-Atlantic abolitionists – freedom in temporary exile. Moving out of Boston, through Canada and across the Atlantic, they arrived in Liverpool late in 1850. They toured Scotland and England at various intervals, appearing publicly with William lecturing both for the Abolitionist cause and for the Uplift of their race. In 1861, William published a book (Running A Thousand Miles for Freedom), Uncle Tom’s Cabin draws on their experience, and they are often mentioned in critical and social commentary of the day. \n\nWilliam and Ellen Craft represented the dark-side of the American socio-political identity to a self-consciously newly emancipated Britain in the mid-nineteenth century. But beyond their abstracted relationship to Britain at mid-century they were, first and foremost, black immigrants inculcating themselves into a foreign white society. The Crafts would remain in Britain for nine years during which they established a new paradigm of Black Victorian’s living in Britain. The bulk of Black immigrants in Britain on their arrival were male, working-class, tied to the sea or to domestic servitude, and unschooled. The Crafts consciously transgressed class boundaries by appearing to assimilate into the prescriptive hegemony of the aspiring middle-classes. Their choice of address, schooling, social circle, and business interests indicate both a real and imagined relationship with an identity vastly dissimilar to the bulk of Black British immigrants and belied expectation. Furthermore, and more importantly, they were not true immigrants in that they never intended to remain in Britain and indeed, after nineteen years they did return home to America. In that time, they had five children, purchased a house, obtained scholastic certificates, established businesses, and were members of various public and private organisations. \n\nThis paper explores this more private and un-worked area of the Craft’s Trans-Atlantic movement. Previously, the interest in William & Ellen’s movement across the Atlantic has been bound up in the narrative of their slavery and their fugitive slave identities. I would like tot shift this focus in my consideration of their sojourn in Britain onto their imagined and achieved black middle-class identities. Who did they imagine themselves to be once they relocated? How did their projected identity differ, and for what purpose where they projecting it? And, in terms of re-invention, what identity opportunities were specific to their geographic and cultural movement?
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».