MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7062111572

Slavery’s sojourners: the trans-Atlantic crossing of William and Ellen Craft (1850 – 1869)

2006· other· en· W7062111572 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · 2006
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermal Analysis in Power Transmission
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCraftHumanityWhite (mutation)NarrativeIdentity (music)BannerChoseUnderground Railroad
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The passage of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 in the United States made even the free territory of the northern states unsafe for escaped slaves. Slaves could be captured and returned to the South at any time without benefit of trial. By late September of 1850 America was no longer a place where any black person could live safely. William and Ellen Craft were two such slaves, who chose – with the help of Trans-Atlantic abolitionists – freedom in temporary exile. Moving out of Boston, through Canada and across the Atlantic, they arrived in Liverpool late in 1850. They toured Scotland and England at various intervals, appearing publicly with William lecturing both for the Abolitionist cause and for the Uplift of their race. In 1861, William published a book (Running A Thousand Miles for Freedom), Uncle Tom’s Cabin draws on their experience, and they are often mentioned in critical and social commentary of the day. William and Ellen Craft represented the dark-side of the American socio-political identity to a self-consciously newly emancipated Britain in the mid-nineteenth century. But beyond their abstracted relationship to Britain at mid-century they were, first and foremost, black immigrants inculcating themselves into a foreign white society. The Crafts would remain in Britain for nine years during which they established a new paradigm of Black Victorian’s living in Britain. The bulk of Black immigrants in Britain on their arrival were male, working-class, tied to the sea or to domestic servitude, and unschooled. The Crafts consciously transgressed class boundaries by appearing to assimilate into the prescriptive hegemony of the aspiring middle-classes. Their choice of address, schooling, social circle, and business interests indicate both a real and imagined relationship with an identity vastly dissimilar to the bulk of Black British immigrants and belied expectation. Furthermore, and more importantly, they were not true immigrants in that they never intended to remain in Britain and indeed, after nineteen years they did return home to America. In that time, they had five children, purchased a house, obtained scholastic certificates, established businesses, and were members of various public and private organisations. This paper explores this more private and un-worked area of the Craft’s Trans-Atlantic movement. Previously, the interest in William & Ellen’s movement across the Atlantic has been bound up in the narrative of their slavery and their fugitive slave identities. I would like tot shift this focus in my consideration of their sojourn in Britain onto their imagined and achieved black middle-class identities. Who did they imagine themselves to be once they relocated? How did their projected identity differ, and for what purpose where they projecting it? And, in terms of re-invention, what identity opportunities were specific to their geographic and cultural movement?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0220.013
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueePrints Soton (University of Southampton)Same topicThermal Analysis in Power TransmissionFrench-language works237,207