SURGICAL RESOLUTION AFTER MULTIMODAL TREATMENT IN A DOG WITH GRANULOMATOUS NODULAR EPISCLERITIS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Granulomatous nodular episcleritis(GNE) is a mixed lymphocytic and granulomatous nodular inflammation of the conjunctiva or adjacent sclera4, rarely described in dogs. Defined as an idiopathic conjunctiva and scleral primary disease, is presumed to be an immune-mediated disorder; although may also be derived from secondary disease1.Clinically characterized by an elevated, non-painful, single or multiple nodular formations, is common in the temporal limbus and may also affect the conjunctiva, episclera and cornea2. In spite of highly suggestive clinical appearance, histopatological analysis is necessary to confirm the diagnosis4. Medical therapy consistis of topically and systemically administrations of corticosteroids and immunomodulators3. Beta-irradiation,cryotherapy and surgical removal may also be used4. Objectives This paper aims to describe the case of a dog with GNE, submitted to multimodal therapeutic management, culminating in surgical resolution. Methodology A 10-year-old Brazilian Mastiff female dog, current on vaccinations and deworming, was consulted, presenting right eye with evidence of a nodular formation of red coloring and epiphora. In the ophthalmological examination, the right eye presented, moderate conjunctival hyperemia, vascularization extending from the conjunctiva to an elevated red colored neoformation, of about 1 cm, located in the region of the temporal bulbar conjunctiva and protruding externally between the eyelids. Lagophthalmia and secondary epiphora were also present. The Schirmer test showed 24mm/min and intraocular pressure a mean value of 16mmHg. Fundoscopy revealed no noticeable changes. The fluorescein test was considered negative and the rose bengal test stained a discrete corneal temporal band. The left eye was physiologically normal. Other diagnostic tests(Hematological and biochemical profile) were unremarkable. A presumptive diagnosis of GNE was considered and a 191 14 day medical therapy was instituted, based on a topical combination of dexamethasone, neomycin and polymyxinB every 6 hours and cyclosporine1.0% every 12 hours. From 15-30 day post-diagnosis topical dexamethasone associated to cyclosporine was maintained and oral therapy with prednisolone 2mg/kg/day was initiated. Between days 31-45 post-diagnosis, topical cyclosporine was maintained and oral therapy with doxycycline 10mg/kg/day was initiated. On day 46, surgical excision was performed, and from 46-56 days period, topically retinol acetate, methionine and chloramphenicol every 6 hours was started; and doxycycline was maintained. After day 56 onwards, topically 0.2% cyclosporine in continuous use was advised to owners and reassessments every 6 months was scheduled. Results In the period of day 0-45, the conjunctival hyperemia and the vascularization of neoformation was reduced. However, no size reduction of neoformation was observed, which kept protruding in between the eyelids, causing lagophthalmia and epiphora. From day 46-56, surgical healing occurred uneventfully. Histopathological examination revealed granulomatous and fibrous inflammatory infiltrate, composed of a mixture of histiocytes, lymphocytes, plasma cells and fibroblasts. Schiff periodic acid staining was negative for fungi. A definitive diagnosis of GNE was achieved and the topical use of cyclosporine was maintained, with no relapse to this date. Conclusion The primary etiology of this condition is presumed to be immunomediated. The surgical exeresis was effective when compared to immunosuppressive therapy(topical and systemic) employed in this case for resolution of GNE. Pathological analysis is always recommended for definitive diagnosis. Bibliography 1. Hamzianpour, N., Heinrich, C., Jones, R. G., McElroy, P., Wilson, N., & Scurrell, E. (2019). Clinical and pathological findings in three dogs with a corneocentric presentation of nodular granulomatous episcleritis. Veterinary ophthalmology. 2. Barnes, L. D., Pearce, J. W., Berent, L. M., Fox, D. B., & Giuliano, E. A. (2010). Surgical management of orbital nodular granulomatous episcleritis in a dog. Veterinary ophthalmology, 13(4), 251-258. 3. Sandmeyer, L. S., & Grahn, B. H. (2008). Diagnostic ophthalmology. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 49(9), 923. 4. Maggs, D., Miller, P., & Ofri, R. (2017). Slatter's Fundamentals of Veterinary Ophthalmology EBook. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».