MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7062615974

SURGICAL RESOLUTION AFTER MULTIMODAL TREATMENT IN A DOG WITH GRANULOMATOUS NODULAR EPISCLERITIS

2020· other· en· W7062615974 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueRepositorio Universidade de Évora (Universidade de Évora) · 2020
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConjunctivaRed eyeUltrasound biomicroscopyEyelidEpiscleritisEye diseaseCornea
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Granulomatous nodular episcleritis(GNE) is a mixed lymphocytic and granulomatous nodular inflammation of the conjunctiva or adjacent sclera4, rarely described in dogs. Defined as an idiopathic conjunctiva and scleral primary disease, is presumed to be an immune-mediated disorder; although may also be derived from secondary disease1.Clinically characterized by an elevated, non-painful, single or multiple nodular formations, is common in the temporal limbus and may also affect the conjunctiva, episclera and cornea2. In spite of highly suggestive clinical appearance, histopatological analysis is necessary to confirm the diagnosis4. Medical therapy consistis of topically and systemically administrations of corticosteroids and immunomodulators3. Beta-irradiation,cryotherapy and surgical removal may also be used4. Objectives This paper aims to describe the case of a dog with GNE, submitted to multimodal therapeutic management, culminating in surgical resolution. Methodology A 10-year-old Brazilian Mastiff female dog, current on vaccinations and deworming, was consulted, presenting right eye with evidence of a nodular formation of red coloring and epiphora. In the ophthalmological examination, the right eye presented, moderate conjunctival hyperemia, vascularization extending from the conjunctiva to an elevated red colored neoformation, of about 1 cm, located in the region of the temporal bulbar conjunctiva and protruding externally between the eyelids. Lagophthalmia and secondary epiphora were also present. The Schirmer test showed 24mm/min and intraocular pressure a mean value of 16mmHg. Fundoscopy revealed no noticeable changes. The fluorescein test was considered negative and the rose bengal test stained a discrete corneal temporal band. The left eye was physiologically normal. Other diagnostic tests(Hematological and biochemical profile) were unremarkable. A presumptive diagnosis of GNE was considered and a 191 14 day medical therapy was instituted, based on a topical combination of dexamethasone, neomycin and polymyxinB every 6 hours and cyclosporine1.0% every 12 hours. From 15-30 day post-diagnosis topical dexamethasone associated to cyclosporine was maintained and oral therapy with prednisolone 2mg/kg/day was initiated. Between days 31-45 post-diagnosis, topical cyclosporine was maintained and oral therapy with doxycycline 10mg/kg/day was initiated. On day 46, surgical excision was performed, and from 46-56 days period, topically retinol acetate, methionine and chloramphenicol every 6 hours was started; and doxycycline was maintained. After day 56 onwards, topically 0.2% cyclosporine in continuous use was advised to owners and reassessments every 6 months was scheduled. Results In the period of day 0-45, the conjunctival hyperemia and the vascularization of neoformation was reduced. However, no size reduction of neoformation was observed, which kept protruding in between the eyelids, causing lagophthalmia and epiphora. From day 46-56, surgical healing occurred uneventfully. Histopathological examination revealed granulomatous and fibrous inflammatory infiltrate, composed of a mixture of histiocytes, lymphocytes, plasma cells and fibroblasts. Schiff periodic acid staining was negative for fungi. A definitive diagnosis of GNE was achieved and the topical use of cyclosporine was maintained, with no relapse to this date. Conclusion The primary etiology of this condition is presumed to be immunomediated. The surgical exeresis was effective when compared to immunosuppressive therapy(topical and systemic) employed in this case for resolution of GNE. Pathological analysis is always recommended for definitive diagnosis. Bibliography 1. Hamzianpour, N., Heinrich, C., Jones, R. G., McElroy, P., Wilson, N., & Scurrell, E. (2019). Clinical and pathological findings in three dogs with a corneocentric presentation of nodular granulomatous episcleritis. Veterinary ophthalmology. 2. Barnes, L. D., Pearce, J. W., Berent, L. M., Fox, D. B., & Giuliano, E. A. (2010). Surgical management of orbital nodular granulomatous episcleritis in a dog. Veterinary ophthalmology, 13(4), 251-258. 3. Sandmeyer, L. S., & Grahn, B. H. (2008). Diagnostic ophthalmology. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 49(9), 923. 4. Maggs, D., Miller, P., & Ofri, R. (2017). Slatter's Fundamentals of Veterinary Ophthalmology EBook. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,667
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,191
Écart entre enseignants0,186 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRepositorio Universidade de Évora (Universidade de Évora)Même sujetParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsTravaux en français237 207