SURGICAL RESOLUTION AFTER MULTIMODAL TREATMENT IN A DOG WITH GRANULOMATOUS NODULAR EPISCLERITIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Granulomatous nodular episcleritis(GNE) is a mixed lymphocytic and granulomatous nodular inflammation of the conjunctiva or adjacent sclera4, rarely described in dogs. Defined as an idiopathic conjunctiva and scleral primary disease, is presumed to be an immune-mediated disorder; although may also be derived from secondary disease1.Clinically characterized by an elevated, non-painful, single or multiple nodular formations, is common in the temporal limbus and may also affect the conjunctiva, episclera and cornea2. In spite of highly suggestive clinical appearance, histopatological analysis is necessary to confirm the diagnosis4. Medical therapy consistis of topically and systemically administrations of corticosteroids and immunomodulators3. Beta-irradiation,cryotherapy and surgical removal may also be used4. Objectives This paper aims to describe the case of a dog with GNE, submitted to multimodal therapeutic management, culminating in surgical resolution. Methodology A 10-year-old Brazilian Mastiff female dog, current on vaccinations and deworming, was consulted, presenting right eye with evidence of a nodular formation of red coloring and epiphora. In the ophthalmological examination, the right eye presented, moderate conjunctival hyperemia, vascularization extending from the conjunctiva to an elevated red colored neoformation, of about 1 cm, located in the region of the temporal bulbar conjunctiva and protruding externally between the eyelids. Lagophthalmia and secondary epiphora were also present. The Schirmer test showed 24mm/min and intraocular pressure a mean value of 16mmHg. Fundoscopy revealed no noticeable changes. The fluorescein test was considered negative and the rose bengal test stained a discrete corneal temporal band. The left eye was physiologically normal. Other diagnostic tests(Hematological and biochemical profile) were unremarkable. A presumptive diagnosis of GNE was considered and a 191 14 day medical therapy was instituted, based on a topical combination of dexamethasone, neomycin and polymyxinB every 6 hours and cyclosporine1.0% every 12 hours. From 15-30 day post-diagnosis topical dexamethasone associated to cyclosporine was maintained and oral therapy with prednisolone 2mg/kg/day was initiated. Between days 31-45 post-diagnosis, topical cyclosporine was maintained and oral therapy with doxycycline 10mg/kg/day was initiated. On day 46, surgical excision was performed, and from 46-56 days period, topically retinol acetate, methionine and chloramphenicol every 6 hours was started; and doxycycline was maintained. After day 56 onwards, topically 0.2% cyclosporine in continuous use was advised to owners and reassessments every 6 months was scheduled. Results In the period of day 0-45, the conjunctival hyperemia and the vascularization of neoformation was reduced. However, no size reduction of neoformation was observed, which kept protruding in between the eyelids, causing lagophthalmia and epiphora. From day 46-56, surgical healing occurred uneventfully. Histopathological examination revealed granulomatous and fibrous inflammatory infiltrate, composed of a mixture of histiocytes, lymphocytes, plasma cells and fibroblasts. Schiff periodic acid staining was negative for fungi. A definitive diagnosis of GNE was achieved and the topical use of cyclosporine was maintained, with no relapse to this date. Conclusion The primary etiology of this condition is presumed to be immunomediated. The surgical exeresis was effective when compared to immunosuppressive therapy(topical and systemic) employed in this case for resolution of GNE. Pathological analysis is always recommended for definitive diagnosis. Bibliography 1. Hamzianpour, N., Heinrich, C., Jones, R. G., McElroy, P., Wilson, N., & Scurrell, E. (2019). Clinical and pathological findings in three dogs with a corneocentric presentation of nodular granulomatous episcleritis. Veterinary ophthalmology. 2. Barnes, L. D., Pearce, J. W., Berent, L. M., Fox, D. B., & Giuliano, E. A. (2010). Surgical management of orbital nodular granulomatous episcleritis in a dog. Veterinary ophthalmology, 13(4), 251-258. 3. Sandmeyer, L. S., & Grahn, B. H. (2008). Diagnostic ophthalmology. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 49(9), 923. 4. Maggs, D., Miller, P., & Ofri, R. (2017). Slatter's Fundamentals of Veterinary Ophthalmology EBook. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".