MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7064525118

Change Managment within Project Processes - a case study at Alfa Laval

2008· other· en· W7064525118 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueLund University Publications Student Papers (Lund University) · 2008
Typeother
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueMagnetic confinement fusion research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFunction (biology)Project managementWork (physics)Project management trianglePhase (matter)Perspective (graphical)Data collectionEarned value managementExtreme project management
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

More and more corporations around the world is starting to work in project form and leaving their traditional function based way of organising themselves behind. This leads to new ways of driving and implementing changes and improvements. It requires another approach and this approach has to deal with the individual employee in a greater extend. Alfa Laval often questions how to make a project to a success story. Helping them making a project a success story is the methodology tool PROMAL containing several steps. Concept, system, et cetera is initially coming from an idea and continues according to PROMAL with a Feasibility phase, Pre Study phase, Implementation phase and finally a Closure phase. OD Supply is a function in the division of Operations that works cross functional and today they deal with two major interrelated issues, that can be called the Gap. ? The Gap derives from varies factors involving different parties in the project organisation. ? Through changed project management the factors can be dealt with more efficient and thereby minimising the Gap. The objectives in this thesis are to help OD Supply identifying and coping with the Gap. We have chosen to use an inductive approach. The reason for this is that the authors think it is more beneficial for the thesis to start with the OD Supply's view of the problem. We are going to start performing interviews and gathering empirical information, all to be able to get a fundamental view and perspective on the situation and circumstances in practice. The method used to analyse the gathered data is best described as a comparing analysis on the base of pattern matching. We have, based on a broad comparison of theory and our research, searched for similarities and differences and tried to draw conclusions and analyse the cause of the various results. We have decided to choose that Change Management is defined as the process of implementing change as efficiently as possible and letting the change reaching its full potential. To be able to do so we have choosen to describe Change Management with the help of three other aspects. These three aspects will be the cornerstones which will build up the foundation of our thesis and they are as follow; Project Management, Tools for efficient Project Management and Cooperation and Participation among the Project Managers. In the Theory chapter the authors present twelve different theories. Under the subcategory Project Management, four theories are presented. These are Project Organisation, Factors for successful Project Management, Different Project Management Styles and the Four Rooms of Change. Next subcategory, Tools for efficient Project Management, is broken down into Characteristics of a generic project model, Lean Production, Six Sigma and Lean Production vs. Six Sigma. Cooperation and Participation at a Project Management Unit is the final subcategory and contains Competence within a group, Idea Generation and Prioritizing, Follow up and feedback, and Competence development. In the Empirical chapter the authors present eleven different aspects. Under the subcategory Project Management, four aspects are discussed. These are Project Management at Alfa Laval, Project Managers view of PROMAL, the Steering Committee, and Project Recievers. Next subcategory, Tools for efficient Project Management, is broken down into PROMAL, Lean Six Sigma and PROMAL and DMAIC together as one. Cooperation and Participation at a Project Management Unit is the final subcategory and contains Efforts to increase the Cooperation and Participation, Generation and Prioritisation of Ideas, Follow up of Projects and Project Managers, and Competence development. In order to analyse the organisations that are benchmarked and to be able to compare them with OD Supply at Alfa Laval Lund, the authors has created a matrix describing the characteristics of the organisations, the Wildlife Matrix. The organisations which have been benchmarked are Alfa Laval OD PHE, Alfa Laval Tumba, Electrolux AB, Ericsson AB, Höganäs AB, IKEA, Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery AB, and Sony Ericsson. Differences occur when using methods for implementing various concepts, processes, strategies and methodologies and that these differences are deviations between strategy and practice that we define as the Gap. During our period of collecting information at Alfa Laval and other companies we have found where the Gap occurs. The factors that create the Gap is the interactions between Project Manager and the Steering Committee, lack of follow up, too slow speed in the projects and a need of a better competence development within OD Supply. In order to decrease, or even better eliminate, the Gap these factor is required to be handled. The authors have made a step model in how to manage the Gap and try to minimise it.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,027
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,069

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,012
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0130,004
Communication savante0,0060,002
Science ouverte0,0030,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,261
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueLund University Publications Student Papers (Lund University)Même sujetMagnetic confinement fusion researchTravaux en français237 207