MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7064525118

Change Managment within Project Processes - a case study at Alfa Laval

2008· other· en· W7064525118 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLund University Publications Student Papers (Lund University) · 2008
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFunction (biology)Project managementWork (physics)Project management trianglePhase (matter)Perspective (graphical)Data collectionEarned value managementExtreme project management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

More and more corporations around the world is starting to work in project form and leaving their traditional function based way of organising themselves behind. This leads to new ways of driving and implementing changes and improvements. It requires another approach and this approach has to deal with the individual employee in a greater extend. Alfa Laval often questions how to make a project to a success story. Helping them making a project a success story is the methodology tool PROMAL containing several steps. Concept, system, et cetera is initially coming from an idea and continues according to PROMAL with a Feasibility phase, Pre Study phase, Implementation phase and finally a Closure phase. OD Supply is a function in the division of Operations that works cross functional and today they deal with two major interrelated issues, that can be called the Gap. ? The Gap derives from varies factors involving different parties in the project organisation. ? Through changed project management the factors can be dealt with more efficient and thereby minimising the Gap. The objectives in this thesis are to help OD Supply identifying and coping with the Gap. We have chosen to use an inductive approach. The reason for this is that the authors think it is more beneficial for the thesis to start with the OD Supply's view of the problem. We are going to start performing interviews and gathering empirical information, all to be able to get a fundamental view and perspective on the situation and circumstances in practice. The method used to analyse the gathered data is best described as a comparing analysis on the base of pattern matching. We have, based on a broad comparison of theory and our research, searched for similarities and differences and tried to draw conclusions and analyse the cause of the various results. We have decided to choose that Change Management is defined as the process of implementing change as efficiently as possible and letting the change reaching its full potential. To be able to do so we have choosen to describe Change Management with the help of three other aspects. These three aspects will be the cornerstones which will build up the foundation of our thesis and they are as follow; Project Management, Tools for efficient Project Management and Cooperation and Participation among the Project Managers. In the Theory chapter the authors present twelve different theories. Under the subcategory Project Management, four theories are presented. These are Project Organisation, Factors for successful Project Management, Different Project Management Styles and the Four Rooms of Change. Next subcategory, Tools for efficient Project Management, is broken down into Characteristics of a generic project model, Lean Production, Six Sigma and Lean Production vs. Six Sigma. Cooperation and Participation at a Project Management Unit is the final subcategory and contains Competence within a group, Idea Generation and Prioritizing, Follow up and feedback, and Competence development. In the Empirical chapter the authors present eleven different aspects. Under the subcategory Project Management, four aspects are discussed. These are Project Management at Alfa Laval, Project Managers view of PROMAL, the Steering Committee, and Project Recievers. Next subcategory, Tools for efficient Project Management, is broken down into PROMAL, Lean Six Sigma and PROMAL and DMAIC together as one. Cooperation and Participation at a Project Management Unit is the final subcategory and contains Efforts to increase the Cooperation and Participation, Generation and Prioritisation of Ideas, Follow up of Projects and Project Managers, and Competence development. In order to analyse the organisations that are benchmarked and to be able to compare them with OD Supply at Alfa Laval Lund, the authors has created a matrix describing the characteristics of the organisations, the Wildlife Matrix. The organisations which have been benchmarked are Alfa Laval OD PHE, Alfa Laval Tumba, Electrolux AB, Ericsson AB, Höganäs AB, IKEA, Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery AB, and Sony Ericsson. Differences occur when using methods for implementing various concepts, processes, strategies and methodologies and that these differences are deviations between strategy and practice that we define as the Gap. During our period of collecting information at Alfa Laval and other companies we have found where the Gap occurs. The factors that create the Gap is the interactions between Project Manager and the Steering Committee, lack of follow up, too slow speed in the projects and a need of a better competence development within OD Supply. In order to decrease, or even better eliminate, the Gap these factor is required to be handled. The authors have made a step model in how to manage the Gap and try to minimise it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLund University Publications Student Papers (Lund University)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207