Evaluating the Dynamics of Knowledge-Based Network Through \nSimulation: The Case of Canadian Nanotechnology Industry
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Collaboration is a major factor in the knowledge and innovation creation in emerging science-driven industries, where the technology is rapidly changing and constantly evolving, such as nanotechnology. The scientific collaborations among individuals and organizations form knowledge co-creation network within which information is shared, innovative ideas are exchanged and new knowledge is generated. Although various simulation attempts have been carried out recently to analyze the performance of such networks at the firm level, the individual level has not been much explored in the literature yet. \nThe objective of this thesis is to investigate the role of individual scientists and their collaborations in enhancing the knowledge flows, and consequently the scientific production within the Canadian nanotechnology scientists. The methodology involves two main phases. First, in order to understand the collaborative behavior of scientists in the real world, the data on all the nanotechnology journal publications in Canada was extracted from the SCOPUS database and the scientists' research performance and partnership history was analyzed using social network analysis. Moreover, the predominant properties that make a scientist sufficiently attractive to be selected as a research partner were determined using data mining and through a questionnaire sent directly to the researchers selected from our database. In the second phase, an agent-based model using Netlogo has been developed to simulate the knowledge-based network where several factors regarding the ratio, existence and absence of various categories of scientists could be controlled. \nIt was found that scientists in centralized positions in such network have a considerable positive impact on the knowledge flows, while loyalty and cliquishness negatively affected the knowledge transmission. Star scientists appear to play a substitutive role in the network as most famous and trustable partners to be selected when usual collaborators are scarce or missing. Besides, the changes in the performance of some categories in case of the absence of others have been also observed. \nThe major contribution of this work stems from the fact that the developed simulation model is the first one, which is fully based on the real data and on the observed behavior of the scientists in knowledge-based network.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle