MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7066497856

Il viaggio migratorio e le conseguenze psicologiche: indagine su un campione di migranti nel comune di Roma

2020· dissertation· en· W7066497856 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueIRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) · 2020
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVulnerability (computing)ResidenceAnonymityEmigrationPopulationCensusPhenomenonMental health
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This work is inserted inside the migrant research line, investigating the migratory experience and the possible psychological consequences. The emigration is a global phenomenon and been so, it has a significant impact on the people who migrate. It could provoke a relevant psychological impact to these persons implying considerable changes. Studies and researches focus the attention toward the experience of the migration, to the effects on the mental health and to the eventual difficulties and psychological disorders both on single person and on group, pre, during and post-migration. The migration even though diversified by motives and ways, still defines a displacement and resettlement experience from own residence toward another one, inside or outside the same country or continent. Italy is fifth European country for migrants’ number (UNHCR, 2019), as one of the border countries of EU. the About last census of UNCHR data 2019 in Italy were arrived 7923 migrants (UNHCR, 2019) The aim of this study is to investigate the travelling experience and the post-travelling living of the migrants, to understand if the different cultural provenience could be associated to a different emotional vulnerability and to a different traumatic impact. Additionally, it proposes to verify the efficacy of the expressive writing over the elaborative processes of the migratory journey. Methods/Design The study describes the methods that are conducted to a population of migrants residing in Rome. For each participant is guaranteed the anonymity and is gathered information regarding the gender, age, nationality, scolarity, quality of life, levels of hopelessness, attachment, the impact of travelling toward Europe, levels of alexithymia, and psychopathological symptoms. This information is collected through self-administered paper and pencil questionnaires. The questionnaires that were used include Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20, Beck Hopelessness Scale, Symptom CheckList-90- Revised, Impact of Events Scale Revised, Short Form-12 Health Survey, State Adult Attachment Measure. The people who accepted to participate were assigned to three groups in a randomized way: the expressive writing group, a group with a neutral writing task, and a control group. The first groups task was to write about their feelings, emotions and deep thoughts about the traveling experience, using the Pennebacker expressive writing technique (2007) writing for 20 minutes each day, for three consecutive days; the second group task was to describe an object in their house, no emotions included writing for 20 minutes for three consecutive days, each day; the third group was the control group without any intervention. The intervention was realized in three different times, T0, T1 (after a week), T2 (follow-up after a month). Results Statistica 10 is used to store, recode and analyze all data. Descriptive analyses and correlations were applied and for each group age (mean), nationality, years of study, scolarity and gender distribution is reported. Post hoc and ANOVA were used to describe the sample and to compare characteristics among the nationalities. The factor Group showed a significant effect on the variable of the Total BHS (F (2,25) = 3,9; p = 0,032) and on its subscale of Motivation (F (2,25) = 4,2; p = 0,026). The repeated factor and the interaction Group x Time showed no significant effects on the variables. Regarding to the planned comparisons, the Experimental Group showed higher values of Motivation, Future Time and Total BHS, compared to the Control Group at T1 and higher values of Future BHS compared to the Neutral Group at T2 (p<.05). Moreover, the Experimental Group at T1 showed a decreased Phobic Anxiety and Positive Symptom Total of SCL-90-R scores compared to T0, and at T2 a decreased Somatization, Phobic Anxiety and Global Severity Index of SCL-90-R scores compared to T0. At T2 there is an increase of BHS Future scores compared to T1 in the Experimental Group. Moreover, there is a decrease of values of BHS Total at the Neutral Group, at T2 compared to T1. Discussion The study showed a positive association between the expressive writing and the traumatic travelling experience of the migrants with the psychopathological symptomology. In fact, the persons who were treated with the Expressive Writing Technique had a lower score of Somatization, Global Severity and Phobic Anxiety compared to the other two groups, therefore improving their well-being. Moreover, further investigations are needed related to the hopelessness and the quality of life psychological constructs. Conclusions Findings from this research have important suggestions about the hosting treatments of the migrants in Italy. Additionally, it provides important information about the traumatic traveling of the migrants and the consequent effects on psychological health determinants. Moreover, it suggests a suitable technique, in order to reduce the effects of the traveling migration trauma, helping for a better integration in the new country; furthermore, it can be inserted as part of a standard protocol to apply to the migrants once they arrive in Italy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,219
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,276 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueIRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)Même sujetAdvanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesTravaux en français237 207