Identifying Determinants of Performance for Females Completing a Paramedic Physical Employment Test
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Sex disparities exist in employment and injury rates in the paramedic sector. Low success rates among females attempting physical employment standards could explain the elevated injury risk among female paramedics. Identifying factors that underpin successful work-related performance can inform pre-hire and return-to-work based physical training programs to address these disparities. \n \nPurpose: The purpose of this thesis was to identify the determinants of successful physical performance for females engaged in paramedic tasks. \n \nResearch Question 1: Participant demographics, college type, employment status and heart rate were obtained from female participants who completed the Ottawa Paramedic Physical Abilities Test (OPPAT), a physical employment standard for paramedics. These data were used in a logistic regression model to determine which factors could predict the likelihood of successfully completing the OPPAT. Females who were actively employed, who were educated in a public paramedic college, who had higher body mass, or those who had lower BMI were more likely to successfully complete the OPPAT. \n \nResearch Question 2: Lift duration and the time between peak knee and hip joint angular velocity during the Scoop and Barbell lift were compared between females who passed and failed the Ottawa Paramedic Physical Abilities Test. Four ANCOVAs were used for these comparisons where college type (public or private) and employment status (employed or unemployed) were used as categorical factors and body mass and BMI were used as covariates. No significant differences were found between passing and failing females. \n \nDiscussion: Modulating demographic factors that increase the likelihood of success could lead to improved performance outcomes, but other determinants should be explored to improve the predictive ability of the current model. Future research should continue to leverage emerging technology, such as markerless motion capture and unsupervised machine learning, to identify determinants of success for females in paramedic tasks.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».