MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7070436512

Pander Society Newsletter 2015

2015· other· en· W7070436512 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueArchivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) · 2015
Typeother
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConodontGenerosityBiostratigraphyDevonianOrdovicianTaxonomy (biology)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Welcome to the 2015 edition of the Pander Society Newsletter, my sixth attempt at providing news \nand a list of conodont publications for the past year! \nI apologize for the tardy release of this issue due to several concurrent causes that, I hope, will \nbe neutralized by the early publication of the 2016 Newsletter. \nOur community has suffered profound losses in conodont studies with the passing of great \nfigures. \nDick Aldridge (whose memorial appeared in the previous newsletter) was Chief Panderer and a \nPander medallist. He had been one of the foremost palaeontologists globally, having been chairman of \nthe International Palaeontological Association. \nAnita Harris, ‘inventor’ of the Colour Alteration Index (CAI), has been one of the brightest \nminds in the world of conodonts. Her generosity in sending CAI standards to those who requested one, \nallowed the application of her method to the collections of all of us. \nGlen Merrill, a renowned specialist mainly on multielement taxonomy of Carboniferous \nconodonts, was one of the first to propose that conodont distributions were environmentally \ncontrolled. \nWe learned only recently about the premature passing of Vladimir Prokopievich Tarabukin in \nJuly 2013. His early studies were on biostratigraphy and Devonian conodonts of eastern Yakutia; his \nlater studies focused on Ordovician biostratigraphy and conodonts of northeast Asia. His Ordovician \nconodonts enabled him to hypothesise reconstructions of the complicated fold systems of the eastern \nSiberian Platform. \nThe year 2014 saw proliferation of research on conodonts in all perspectives of biostratigraphy, \npalaeoecology, palaeogeography, ontogeny and taxonomy, the last fruitfully on apparatus \nreconstructions and geochemistry, all aired in formal and informal meetings of the Pander Society. \nThe first formal meeting of the year was the Pander Society Workshop foreshadowed in the \n2014 Newsletter, was held in Bologna in February 2014. It was professionally organized by Claudia \n(Spalletta) for proposing, inter alia, planning for the next International Conodont Symposium (ICOS- \n4) to be held in Valencia, Spain, in 2017. During that event Maria Corriga was awarded a Hinde \nmedal. \nThe second formal Pander Society meeting was held in Vancouver, British Columbia (Canada) \nin October 2014 in association with the Geological Society of America. The session, sponsored by the \nPaleontological Society and the Pander Society and organized by Charles Henderson, focused on \nconodonts as stratigraphic and palaeoclimatic tools. \nThe 4th annual meeting of the IGCP 591, hosted in Estonia in June 2014, was organized jointly \nwith the Department of Geology of the University of Tartu, the Institute of Geology of the \nTallinn University of Technology, and with support from the Geological Society of Estonia. It \ntargeted evolutionary palaeoecology and palaeobiogeography. The event brought together a large \nnumber of conodont specialists as did the 2014 Field Workshop of IGCP 591 in Kunming (China) in \nAugust 2014 jointly with ISOS and ISCS, whose formal theme was ‘Global Events and their \nrelationships in the Early to Middle Paleozoic’. \nNo dedicated Pander Society meeting was organized during the 4th International \nPalaeontological Congress in Mendoza, Argentina, between the end September and early October \n2014. Nevertheless much research dealing with conodonts was presented in several sessions. \nIn Provo, Utah, in the presence of family and friends, David Clark was awarded the Pander \nSociety medal by Ray Scott. David “was one of the international leaders in modern conodont research \nand played an outstanding role as researcher and teacher” as written in one of the letters supporting his \nnomination. The ceremony took place on 13 September at David’s home and was given a re-run in the \n3 \nfield close to an Ordovician section. I thank Ray Scott for bestowing the Pander medal on my behalf. \nBecause I could not attend all meetings, I am grateful to each of you who provided information \nthat I could insert in the newsletter. I thank those who urged partners in work as well as masters and \nPhD students to join the Pander Society. I also thank all those who sent changes of addresses and emails \nof colleagues. \nThank you for sending in your contributions! Thanks also to Susana Garcia-Lopez, John \nRepetski and Wang Cheng-Yuan for deliberating on nominations for the Society's medals. \nI am always grateful to Claudia Spalletta and Myriam Matteucci for helping me generate this \nnewsletter. Special thanks go to Myriam for her enormous help in assembling the entire bibliography \nand providing the version in EndNote of this year’s entries. Thanks also to John Talent for cleaning up \nmy ‘Italish’.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,549
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,643

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0090,005
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,5490,444

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,241
Écart entre enseignants0,220 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArchivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)Travaux en français237 207