Bibliographic record
Abstract
Welcome to the 2015 edition of the Pander Society Newsletter, my sixth attempt at providing news \nand a list of conodont publications for the past year! \nI apologize for the tardy release of this issue due to several concurrent causes that, I hope, will \nbe neutralized by the early publication of the 2016 Newsletter. \nOur community has suffered profound losses in conodont studies with the passing of great \nfigures. \nDick Aldridge (whose memorial appeared in the previous newsletter) was Chief Panderer and a \nPander medallist. He had been one of the foremost palaeontologists globally, having been chairman of \nthe International Palaeontological Association. \nAnita Harris, ‘inventor’ of the Colour Alteration Index (CAI), has been one of the brightest \nminds in the world of conodonts. Her generosity in sending CAI standards to those who requested one, \nallowed the application of her method to the collections of all of us. \nGlen Merrill, a renowned specialist mainly on multielement taxonomy of Carboniferous \nconodonts, was one of the first to propose that conodont distributions were environmentally \ncontrolled. \nWe learned only recently about the premature passing of Vladimir Prokopievich Tarabukin in \nJuly 2013. His early studies were on biostratigraphy and Devonian conodonts of eastern Yakutia; his \nlater studies focused on Ordovician biostratigraphy and conodonts of northeast Asia. His Ordovician \nconodonts enabled him to hypothesise reconstructions of the complicated fold systems of the eastern \nSiberian Platform. \nThe year 2014 saw proliferation of research on conodonts in all perspectives of biostratigraphy, \npalaeoecology, palaeogeography, ontogeny and taxonomy, the last fruitfully on apparatus \nreconstructions and geochemistry, all aired in formal and informal meetings of the Pander Society. \nThe first formal meeting of the year was the Pander Society Workshop foreshadowed in the \n2014 Newsletter, was held in Bologna in February 2014. It was professionally organized by Claudia \n(Spalletta) for proposing, inter alia, planning for the next International Conodont Symposium (ICOS- \n4) to be held in Valencia, Spain, in 2017. During that event Maria Corriga was awarded a Hinde \nmedal. \nThe second formal Pander Society meeting was held in Vancouver, British Columbia (Canada) \nin October 2014 in association with the Geological Society of America. The session, sponsored by the \nPaleontological Society and the Pander Society and organized by Charles Henderson, focused on \nconodonts as stratigraphic and palaeoclimatic tools. \nThe 4th annual meeting of the IGCP 591, hosted in Estonia in June 2014, was organized jointly \nwith the Department of Geology of the University of Tartu, the Institute of Geology of the \nTallinn University of Technology, and with support from the Geological Society of Estonia. It \ntargeted evolutionary palaeoecology and palaeobiogeography. The event brought together a large \nnumber of conodont specialists as did the 2014 Field Workshop of IGCP 591 in Kunming (China) in \nAugust 2014 jointly with ISOS and ISCS, whose formal theme was ‘Global Events and their \nrelationships in the Early to Middle Paleozoic’. \nNo dedicated Pander Society meeting was organized during the 4th International \nPalaeontological Congress in Mendoza, Argentina, between the end September and early October \n2014. Nevertheless much research dealing with conodonts was presented in several sessions. \nIn Provo, Utah, in the presence of family and friends, David Clark was awarded the Pander \nSociety medal by Ray Scott. David “was one of the international leaders in modern conodont research \nand played an outstanding role as researcher and teacher” as written in one of the letters supporting his \nnomination. The ceremony took place on 13 September at David’s home and was given a re-run in the \n3 \nfield close to an Ordovician section. I thank Ray Scott for bestowing the Pander medal on my behalf. \nBecause I could not attend all meetings, I am grateful to each of you who provided information \nthat I could insert in the newsletter. I thank those who urged partners in work as well as masters and \nPhD students to join the Pander Society. I also thank all those who sent changes of addresses and emails \nof colleagues. \nThank you for sending in your contributions! Thanks also to Susana Garcia-Lopez, John \nRepetski and Wang Cheng-Yuan for deliberating on nominations for the Society's medals. \nI am always grateful to Claudia Spalletta and Myriam Matteucci for helping me generate this \nnewsletter. Special thanks go to Myriam for her enormous help in assembling the entire bibliography \nand providing the version in EndNote of this year’s entries. Thanks also to John Talent for cleaning up \nmy ‘Italish’.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.549 | 0.444 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".