?rg?t k?lt?r? ve EFQM m?kemmellik modeli aras?ndaki ili?ki; Sa?l?k Bakanl???'na ba?l? d?rt farkl? do?um hastanesinde bir uygulama
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
?zellikle 20. y?zy?l?n son ?eyre?inde i?letmeler, performanslar?n? geli?tirme, ?retkenliklerini artt?rma, y?netsel etkinli?i sa?lama, karlar?n? maksimize etme, rekabette ?ne ge?me gibi ama?lara ula?mak i?in de?i?ik yollar aramaya ba?lam??t?r. Bu nedenle kurumda hakim olan ?rg?t k?lt?r?n? tan?mak ve ?zde?erlendirme yapmak ?nemlidir. ?al??mam?z kapsam?nda, idari yap?s?, personel say?s?, y?netim ?ekli ve anlay??? gibi birbirinden farkl? ?zelliklere sahip ikisi ?zmir, di?erleri Ayd?n ve Eski?ehir'de bulunan, toplam d?rt kad?n do?um bran? hastanesi incelenmi?tir. Hastane ?al??anlar?na, Cameron ve Quinn'in geli?tirdi?i, ?rg?t K?lt?r? De?erlendirme ?l?e?i ve EFQM M?kemmellik Modeli kriterlerini i?eren, yap?land?r?lm?? anket tekni?i uygulanm??t?r. Hastanelerdeki ?rg?t k?lt?r? ve ?rg?t k?lt?r? ile EFQM M?kemmellik Modeli kriterleri aras?ndaki ili?ki irdelenmi?tir. Genel olarak t?m hastanelerde hiyerar?i k?lt?r?n?n ?ne ??kt???, m?kemmellik bile?enleri ile birlikte incelendi?inde ise, istenen ?rg?t k?lt?r? tipinin klan k?lt?r? oldu?u g?r?lm??t?r. Hastanelerin ?rg?t k?lt?r? puanlar? ve m?kemmellik modeli bile?enleri kar??la?t?r?ld???nda, ?zellikle Eski?ehir Do?umevi ile di?er hastaneler aras?nda, istatistiksel olarak anlaml? farkl?l?klar bulunmu?tur. Bunun nedenleri aras?nda Eski?ehir Do?umevi'nin 2001 y?l?ndan beri EFQM M?kemmellik Modelini benimsemi? olmas? say?labilir. Yap?lan analizler sonucu, klan k?lt?r?ne sahip i?letmelerin, daha olumlu bir ?rg?t iklimine ve daha kaliteli bir sisteme sahip olaca??, hiyerar?i k?lt?r?ne sahip i?letmelerin ise m?kemmelli?e daha kolay ula?abilece?i s?ylenebilir. In the last quarter of 20th century, business enterprises began to look for different ways of achieving improved performance, increased productivity, higher managerial effectiveness, profit maximization and competitive advantage. For this, it is important to get to know the organizational culture of the business enterprise and make critical evaluations. In our study, four maternity hospitals with varying properties in terms of administrative structure, number of personnel, management style and philosophy have been examined, two in Izmir, one in Aydin and one in Eskisehir. The personnel of these hospitals have been subjected to a structured interview technique containing EFQM Excellence Model criteria and Organizational Culture Assessment Scale that have been devoloped by Cameron and Quinn. Organizational culture and the relationship between the organizational culture and EFQM Excellence Model criteria at these four hospitals have been studied. It has been observed that in general all the hospitals had a culture of hierarchy and when examined together with the elements of excellence, the desired type of organizational culture was clan culture. When organizational culture scores and elements of excellence model were compared, statistically significant differences were found between, Eskisehir Hospital and the other three hospitals. One of the reasons for this may be the fact that Eskisehir Hospital had adopted EFQM Excellence Model in 2001. As a result of the analysis performed, it may be concluded that the enterprises that have clan culture are likely to achieve a more positive organizational culture and a system of higher quality whereas those that have culture of hierarchy are likely to achieve excellence more easily.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle