大学生のライフスタイルと健康状態について : 寮生活者の実態調査
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
An investigation was carried out on the state of health and healthy index of male and female university students, especially those living in dormitories, evaluated from the extent to which the students have a healthy lifestyle. The subjects of the investigation were domitory students, namely 120 males (Canadians, foreigners in Japan, and Japanese) and 183 females (Canadians and Japanese). Moreover, 40 male students and 101 female students living at home and commuting to university were chosen to contrast the students in domitories. The results are as follows : 1. Over 50% of home-based students were found to have a health lifestyle, whereas both Canadian and Japanese male and female students who lived in domitories were found to be comparatively less so. 2. Canadian male and female domitory students were found to have the least balanced diet of all, followed by Japanese domitory students than foreigners in Japan. 3. In comparing Japanese and Canadian, male and female atudents, of 10 foodstuffs surveyed Japanese had the most balanced diet and had higher intake of eggs, fish, soybean and seaweed products, whereas Canadians had higher frequiencies of milk intake and taking exercise. Also, both Japanese male and female students had a higher healty lifestyle index. 4. In comparing male and female, in general male students had higher rates of both smorking and taking exercise, whereas female students often skipped breakfast and had a more unbalanced diet, it was also recognized that they tended to have high intakes of nutrients. 5. There was remarkable difference in subjective symptoms relating to the Todai Health Index (THI) between males and females in the group. 6. In an addition of the subjects' weight to items in the THI, a statistically meaningful interelationship was discovered between the calculated value and the subjects' lifestyle in both males and females, and each other was recognized. Apart from foreigners living in Japan there was recognized especially a statistically meaningful negative relationship between the calculated score and the healthy lifestyle index of the subject group.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».