Elemental analysis (TC, TOC, IC) and X-Ray diffraction (XRD) data from sediment core PS72/422-5 (Mendeleev Ridge, Arctic Ocean)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
On a 700 km long transect at about 80° 30' N from the Canada Basin across the central Mendeleev Ridge into the Makarov Basin 10 sediment cores were retrieved during Polarstern Expedition PS72 (Jokat, 2009), including Core PS72/422-5 (80°32.58'N, 175°44.75'W; 2463 m water depth). The predominent lithology is silty clay (to sandy silty clay) of brown to dark brown, light to dark yellowish brown, and light olive brown colours. Occasionally, more sandy intervals, dropstones, and mud clasts occur (Stein et al., 2009, 2010b). The most prominent features of all cores recovered on the PS72 transect across Mendeleev Ridge are colour cycles of brown to dark brown and light olive brown to yellowish brown sediments occurring down to the bottom of the cores, and specific marker horizons (i.e., pink-white and white layers). Based on the visual core description, the standard lithological units A to M developed by Clark et al. (1980) using several hundred of short sediments cores collected from Ice Island T-3 (or Fletcher's Ice Island) in the Amerasian Basin, could also be identified in the PS72 sediment cores from the central Mendeleev Ridge transect as well. Following Clark et al. (1980), the content of sand-sized material (enriched in units C, F, H, J, L, and parts of M) and the pink-white (dolomite-rich) layers were considered to be the key sedimentary characteristic used for correlation of these lithostratigraphic units and indicative for input ice-rafted debris (IRD) during tims of extended glaciations (Stein et al., 2009, 2010a, 2010b). This very specific coarse-grained and dolomite-rich lithology can be related to a restricted source area in the Canadian Arctic (Bank Island, Victoria Island) where Paleozoic carbonates (dolomite) are cropping out, and it can be interpreted as pulses of increased iceberg discharge due to the disintegration of extended Canadian glacial ice sheets (e.g., Clark et al., 1980; Vogt, 1997; Phillips and Grantz, 2001; Stein et al., 2010a, 2010b).Elemental analysis and X-Ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were carried-out at the Alfred Wegener Institute by Isabell Schulte-Loh as part of her Master Thesis (Schulte-Loh, 2010). For the measurement of bulk parameters by means of elemental analysis, freeze-dried and homogenized sediments were used. Total organic carbon (TOC) contents were measured by Carbon-Sulfur Analyser (CS-125, Leco) after removing carbonate with hydrochloric acid. Total carbon (TC) contents were determined by Carbon-Nitrogen-Sulfur Analyser (Elementar III, Vario). Inorganic (carbonate) carbon (IC) was calculated as IC = TC-TOC. In order to reconstruct the detrital sediment provenance, transport processes and ice-sheet history, X-Ray diffraction (XRD) analyses were carried-out using ground bulk sediment (Stein et al., 2010a). The relative contents of the determined minerals are expressed as relative peak intensities. Based on XRD data determined on a selected set of samples, the major proportion of the inorganic carbon is related to dolomite and calcite whereas aragonite and siderite only occur in very, very minor amounts. Thus, for getting a first-order estimate of the detrital carbonate (dolomite), the inorganic carbon was simply divided into its calcite and dolomite proportions using the relative intensity values of the calcite (3.04 Å) and dolomite (2.89 Å) XRD peaks and assuming that calcite plus dolomite equals to the total carbonate content (IC) (for details and calculation procedure see Stein et al., 2010a).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».