Elemental analysis (TC, TOC, IC) and X-Ray diffraction (XRD) data from sediment core PS72/422-5 (Mendeleev Ridge, Arctic Ocean)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On a 700 km long transect at about 80° 30' N from the Canada Basin across the central Mendeleev Ridge into the Makarov Basin 10 sediment cores were retrieved during Polarstern Expedition PS72 (Jokat, 2009), including Core PS72/422-5 (80°32.58'N, 175°44.75'W; 2463 m water depth). The predominent lithology is silty clay (to sandy silty clay) of brown to dark brown, light to dark yellowish brown, and light olive brown colours. Occasionally, more sandy intervals, dropstones, and mud clasts occur (Stein et al., 2009, 2010b). The most prominent features of all cores recovered on the PS72 transect across Mendeleev Ridge are colour cycles of brown to dark brown and light olive brown to yellowish brown sediments occurring down to the bottom of the cores, and specific marker horizons (i.e., pink-white and white layers). Based on the visual core description, the standard lithological units A to M developed by Clark et al. (1980) using several hundred of short sediments cores collected from Ice Island T-3 (or Fletcher's Ice Island) in the Amerasian Basin, could also be identified in the PS72 sediment cores from the central Mendeleev Ridge transect as well. Following Clark et al. (1980), the content of sand-sized material (enriched in units C, F, H, J, L, and parts of M) and the pink-white (dolomite-rich) layers were considered to be the key sedimentary characteristic used for correlation of these lithostratigraphic units and indicative for input ice-rafted debris (IRD) during tims of extended glaciations (Stein et al., 2009, 2010a, 2010b). This very specific coarse-grained and dolomite-rich lithology can be related to a restricted source area in the Canadian Arctic (Bank Island, Victoria Island) where Paleozoic carbonates (dolomite) are cropping out, and it can be interpreted as pulses of increased iceberg discharge due to the disintegration of extended Canadian glacial ice sheets (e.g., Clark et al., 1980; Vogt, 1997; Phillips and Grantz, 2001; Stein et al., 2010a, 2010b).Elemental analysis and X-Ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were carried-out at the Alfred Wegener Institute by Isabell Schulte-Loh as part of her Master Thesis (Schulte-Loh, 2010). For the measurement of bulk parameters by means of elemental analysis, freeze-dried and homogenized sediments were used. Total organic carbon (TOC) contents were measured by Carbon-Sulfur Analyser (CS-125, Leco) after removing carbonate with hydrochloric acid. Total carbon (TC) contents were determined by Carbon-Nitrogen-Sulfur Analyser (Elementar III, Vario). Inorganic (carbonate) carbon (IC) was calculated as IC = TC-TOC. In order to reconstruct the detrital sediment provenance, transport processes and ice-sheet history, X-Ray diffraction (XRD) analyses were carried-out using ground bulk sediment (Stein et al., 2010a). The relative contents of the determined minerals are expressed as relative peak intensities. Based on XRD data determined on a selected set of samples, the major proportion of the inorganic carbon is related to dolomite and calcite whereas aragonite and siderite only occur in very, very minor amounts. Thus, for getting a first-order estimate of the detrital carbonate (dolomite), the inorganic carbon was simply divided into its calcite and dolomite proportions using the relative intensity values of the calcite (3.04 Å) and dolomite (2.89 Å) XRD peaks and assuming that calcite plus dolomite equals to the total carbonate content (IC) (for details and calculation procedure see Stein et al., 2010a).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".