Understanding the role of child social determinants of health and inflammatory bowel disease: A Scoping Review Study Protocol
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This research project aims to conduct a scoping review to explore the relationship between childhood social determinants of health (CSDoH) and the development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a chronic autoimmune condition that includes Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. While IBD affects 7–10 million individuals globally and is increasingly common in children under the age of 18, particularly in Canada [1], the role of early-life social factors in influencing disease onset remains poorly understood. The study is grounded in the growing recognition that non-medical social factors such as income, housing, education, and family environment can profoundly affect health outcomes [2]. The central hypothesis is that certain adverse CSDoH may be associated with an increased risk of developing IBD during childhood or adolescence. This scoping review will follow the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols - Extension for Scoping Reviews) and the methodological framework by Arksey and O’Malley [3]. Three major databases, PubMed, SCOPUS, and PsychInfo, will be systematically searched using MeSH and keyword terms related to IBD and each of the 13 CSDoH of interest. These childhood SDoH include: low-income household; rural or remote location; family received income assistance; parent involved in the criminal justice system; parent did not graduate high school; lived in social housing; parent immigrated from another country; family with high residential mobility (i.e., moved frequently); child of a teen mother; mental disorder as a child; mother with a mental disorder; mother with a physical disorder; and being placed in the care of another adult. Studies published in English between 2000 and 2024 will be identified through searches of PubMed, SCOPUS and PsychInfo using MeSH and keyword terms for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and 13 predefined childhood social determinants of health (CSDoH). All study types will be considered if they examine IBD in relation to at least one CSDoH. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts, and full texts, with a third reviewer resolving any disagreements. Data will be charted using Covidence and Excel, and findings will be summarized narratively and in tables, following PRISMA guidelines [4]. The review will identify key themes, research gaps, and inform socially-informed IBD prevention strategies. We will examine the evidence base to understand more about the role of adverse childhood social determinants of health and development of IBD. Our approach will allow us to understand the current state of the literature in this area as well as help identify gaps that can be addressed by future investigation in this area. The results may also help us identify possible points of intervention for the prevention of inflammatory bowel disease in high-risk groups. This project will also inform an administrative data-based project on CSDoH and IBD among Manitobans. Citations: 1. Carroll MW, Kuenzig ME, Mack DR, et al. The Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada 2018: Children and Adolescents with IBD. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2019;2(Suppl 1):S49-S67. doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy056 2. Braveman P, Gottlieb L. The social determinants of health: It’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(Suppl 2):19-31. doi:10.1177/00333549141291S206 3. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616 4. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-473. doi:10.7326/M18-0850
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».