MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7078945406 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/xk6wt

Understanding the role of child social determinants of health and inflammatory bowel disease: A Scoping Review Study Protocol

2025· other· en· W7078945406 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial determinants of healthMental healthDiseaseAffect (linguistics)Systematic reviewHealth careInflammatory bowel diseasePublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research project aims to conduct a scoping review to explore the relationship between childhood social determinants of health (CSDoH) and the development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a chronic autoimmune condition that includes Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. While IBD affects 7–10 million individuals globally and is increasingly common in children under the age of 18, particularly in Canada [1], the role of early-life social factors in influencing disease onset remains poorly understood. The study is grounded in the growing recognition that non-medical social factors such as income, housing, education, and family environment can profoundly affect health outcomes [2]. The central hypothesis is that certain adverse CSDoH may be associated with an increased risk of developing IBD during childhood or adolescence. This scoping review will follow the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols - Extension for Scoping Reviews) and the methodological framework by Arksey and O’Malley [3]. Three major databases, PubMed, SCOPUS, and PsychInfo, will be systematically searched using MeSH and keyword terms related to IBD and each of the 13 CSDoH of interest. These childhood SDoH include: low-income household; rural or remote location; family received income assistance; parent involved in the criminal justice system; parent did not graduate high school; lived in social housing; parent immigrated from another country; family with high residential mobility (i.e., moved frequently); child of a teen mother; mental disorder as a child; mother with a mental disorder; mother with a physical disorder; and being placed in the care of another adult. Studies published in English between 2000 and 2024 will be identified through searches of PubMed, SCOPUS and PsychInfo using MeSH and keyword terms for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and 13 predefined childhood social determinants of health (CSDoH). All study types will be considered if they examine IBD in relation to at least one CSDoH. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts, and full texts, with a third reviewer resolving any disagreements. Data will be charted using Covidence and Excel, and findings will be summarized narratively and in tables, following PRISMA guidelines [4]. The review will identify key themes, research gaps, and inform socially-informed IBD prevention strategies. We will examine the evidence base to understand more about the role of adverse childhood social determinants of health and development of IBD. Our approach will allow us to understand the current state of the literature in this area as well as help identify gaps that can be addressed by future investigation in this area. The results may also help us identify possible points of intervention for the prevention of inflammatory bowel disease in high-risk groups. This project will also inform an administrative data-based project on CSDoH and IBD among Manitobans. Citations: 1. Carroll MW, Kuenzig ME, Mack DR, et al. The Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada 2018: Children and Adolescents with IBD. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2019;2(Suppl 1):S49-S67. doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy056 2. Braveman P, Gottlieb L. The social determinants of health: It’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(Suppl 2):19-31. doi:10.1177/00333549141291S206 3. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616 4. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-473. doi:10.7326/M18-0850

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Science FrameworkSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207