MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7091350855 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17358754

Murina hilonghilong Eger, Sedlock, Lim & Heaney, 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· en· W7091350855 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Établissements canadiensRoyal Ontario Museum
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRange (aeronautics)HolotypeMitochondrial DNAAnatidaeSequence (biology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Murina hilonghilong sp. nov. (Figs. 1, 8A, 9A; Tables 1, 2A, 2B). Holotype. FMNH 190118, field number RKSG 82, adult male, alcohol specimen with skull extracted, collected in a harp trap by R. K. S. Gomez, 30 July 2006. The holotype is currently housed at FMNH but will be transferred to the National Museum of the Philippines, Manila before the end of 2025 where it has been assigned PNM 9674. The nucleotide sequence as deposited in Genbank of Cytb mitochondrial gene is PV659272 and DBY nuclear gene is PV659349. Type locality. Barangay (Brgy.) Adlay, Carrascal Municipality, Surigao del Sur Province, Hilong-hilong Range, Mindanao Is., Philippines (coordinates not recorded in the field, subsequently estimated from topographic maps as 9.088 N, 125.73 E); elevation 85 m. Paratype. FMNH 191407 female, (RKSG 198) collected 17 October 2006 at Brgy San Antonio, Mt Hilonghilong, Agusan del Norte Province, Mindanao Is. Philippines (coordinates not recorded in the field, subsequently estimated from topographic maps as 9.087 N, 125.70 E; elevation 1400 m). Etymology. This species is named after the mountain range where it was captured, Mt. Hilong-hilong, which stretches across two provinces— Agusan del Norte and Surigao del Sur in northeastern Mindanao. We use the name of the mountain as a noun in apposition. Measurements of holotype. (in mm) and body mass (in g): total length, 91; tail vertebrae, 31; hind foot, 9; ear, 15, forearm, 41; and mass, 10. Diagnosis. This is the largest species of Murina in the Philippines, and the largest of all species of Murina. Murina hilonghilong has dentition like Murina cyclotis with upper premolars similar in size to each other, with reduced mesostyles on M 1 and M 2 (Fig. 9A) and reduced talonids on the lower molars (M 1 and M 2; Fig. 9A) but is larger in body size and skull size, with a white ventrum and a large difference in Cytb sequence (>17%). The sagittal and lambdoidal crests are well defined. Description. The dorsal fur is tricoloured, with pale grey bases changing to buff with pale reddish-brown tips; guard hairs also have reddish brown tips. The ventrum is unicoloured white from the throat to the centre of the abdomen. On the sides of the abdomen the hairs are white at the base blending to buff tips. The guard hairs on the belly are long, white, and shiny, more obvious in the mid ventrum than along the sides. The uropatagium is hairy (pale orange) with long hairs covering the proximal half. Likewise, the feet are covered with long hairs extending beyond the claws. The forearm and thumb are also quite hairy, but the hairs are short and pale in colour. The ears are relatively short with a notch on the posterior border. The tragus is long and typical of Murina species. The calcar is long, and the wing membrane is inserted on the side of the toe at the base of the claw. The skull is robust with a deep rostrum which has a well-marked rostral depression, and heavy, well developed sagittal and clearly defined lambdoid crests (Fig. 8A). The upper toothrows are parallel and the teeth are heavy in appearance. The inner upper incisor is simple in shape with a bicuspidate tip that may not be obvious in a worn tooth, and the tooth is mostly obscured by the larger outer incisor. The upper canine is large and heavy, P 2 and P 4 are similar in shape with P 4 slightly larger than P 2. The first and second upper molars are similar in size and shape with greatly reduced mesostyles. As in other species of Murina, M 3 is greatly reduced. The basisphenoid pits are well defined and tear drop in shape (Fig. 9A). On the mandible, the incisors are tricuspidate, and the remaining teeth are heavy in appearance. The canine is short but slightly longer than the premolars in both sexes; P 4 is larger than P 2 and both premolars on the male specimen are worn. M 1 is larger than M 2 and the talonid on M 1 is approximately ¼ the size of the trigonid but on M2 it is closer to 1/3 the size of the trigonid. The male holotype is significantly smaller in skull and external measurements than the female paratype (PC1) and they differ in shape (PC2, Fig. 6). The coronoid process is distinctly shorter in the male relative to the female accounting for their difference in shape (Fig. 6) (HCP 6.3 mm (♂) and 7.6 (♀). See Tables 1 and 2A, 2B for selected external and skull measurements. ○ = Female □ = Male Ecology. The only two specimens representing this species were captured at 85 m elevation in magkono (ironwood) forest (Xanthostemon verdugonianus) and in regenerating transitional lowland-montane forest at 1400 m on Mt. Hilong-hilong, the highest mountain in northeastern Mindanao and a Key Biodiversity Area (Mallari et al. 2001). Home to endemic birds, mammals, and amphibians (Plaza & Sanguila 2015, Gracia et al. 2021), Mt. Hilonghilong was identified in 2014 by Bird Life International as an Important Bird and Biodiversity Area in Danger. Distribution. Currently known only from two localities in NE Mindanao, associated with the Hilong-hilong Mountain Range (Fig.1). They probably occur elsewhere in this area. Genetic Analyses. Cytochrome b and Dby sequences are available on GenBank for specimens listed in Appendices 2 and 3. Murina hilonghilong is one of three divergent lineages supported by Dby data (one site, Fig. 2) from the Philippines that is closely related to M. cyclotis from mainland Asia. Relative divergences among Philippine species are discussed below.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,036

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,245
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies→Travaux en français237 207→