MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7091350855 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17358754

Murina hilonghilong Eger, Sedlock, Lim & Heaney, 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· en· W7091350855 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ontario Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRange (aeronautics)HolotypeMitochondrial DNAAnatidaeSequence (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Murina hilonghilong sp. nov. (Figs. 1, 8A, 9A; Tables 1, 2A, 2B). Holotype. FMNH 190118, field number RKSG 82, adult male, alcohol specimen with skull extracted, collected in a harp trap by R. K. S. Gomez, 30 July 2006. The holotype is currently housed at FMNH but will be transferred to the National Museum of the Philippines, Manila before the end of 2025 where it has been assigned PNM 9674. The nucleotide sequence as deposited in Genbank of Cytb mitochondrial gene is PV659272 and DBY nuclear gene is PV659349. Type locality. Barangay (Brgy.) Adlay, Carrascal Municipality, Surigao del Sur Province, Hilong-hilong Range, Mindanao Is., Philippines (coordinates not recorded in the field, subsequently estimated from topographic maps as 9.088 N, 125.73 E); elevation 85 m. Paratype. FMNH 191407 female, (RKSG 198) collected 17 October 2006 at Brgy San Antonio, Mt Hilonghilong, Agusan del Norte Province, Mindanao Is. Philippines (coordinates not recorded in the field, subsequently estimated from topographic maps as 9.087 N, 125.70 E; elevation 1400 m). Etymology. This species is named after the mountain range where it was captured, Mt. Hilong-hilong, which stretches across two provinces— Agusan del Norte and Surigao del Sur in northeastern Mindanao. We use the name of the mountain as a noun in apposition. Measurements of holotype. (in mm) and body mass (in g): total length, 91; tail vertebrae, 31; hind foot, 9; ear, 15, forearm, 41; and mass, 10. Diagnosis. This is the largest species of Murina in the Philippines, and the largest of all species of Murina. Murina hilonghilong has dentition like Murina cyclotis with upper premolars similar in size to each other, with reduced mesostyles on M 1 and M 2 (Fig. 9A) and reduced talonids on the lower molars (M 1 and M 2; Fig. 9A) but is larger in body size and skull size, with a white ventrum and a large difference in Cytb sequence (>17%). The sagittal and lambdoidal crests are well defined. Description. The dorsal fur is tricoloured, with pale grey bases changing to buff with pale reddish-brown tips; guard hairs also have reddish brown tips. The ventrum is unicoloured white from the throat to the centre of the abdomen. On the sides of the abdomen the hairs are white at the base blending to buff tips. The guard hairs on the belly are long, white, and shiny, more obvious in the mid ventrum than along the sides. The uropatagium is hairy (pale orange) with long hairs covering the proximal half. Likewise, the feet are covered with long hairs extending beyond the claws. The forearm and thumb are also quite hairy, but the hairs are short and pale in colour. The ears are relatively short with a notch on the posterior border. The tragus is long and typical of Murina species. The calcar is long, and the wing membrane is inserted on the side of the toe at the base of the claw. The skull is robust with a deep rostrum which has a well-marked rostral depression, and heavy, well developed sagittal and clearly defined lambdoid crests (Fig. 8A). The upper toothrows are parallel and the teeth are heavy in appearance. The inner upper incisor is simple in shape with a bicuspidate tip that may not be obvious in a worn tooth, and the tooth is mostly obscured by the larger outer incisor. The upper canine is large and heavy, P 2 and P 4 are similar in shape with P 4 slightly larger than P 2. The first and second upper molars are similar in size and shape with greatly reduced mesostyles. As in other species of Murina, M 3 is greatly reduced. The basisphenoid pits are well defined and tear drop in shape (Fig. 9A). On the mandible, the incisors are tricuspidate, and the remaining teeth are heavy in appearance. The canine is short but slightly longer than the premolars in both sexes; P 4 is larger than P 2 and both premolars on the male specimen are worn. M 1 is larger than M 2 and the talonid on M 1 is approximately ¼ the size of the trigonid but on M2 it is closer to 1/3 the size of the trigonid. The male holotype is significantly smaller in skull and external measurements than the female paratype (PC1) and they differ in shape (PC2, Fig. 6). The coronoid process is distinctly shorter in the male relative to the female accounting for their difference in shape (Fig. 6) (HCP 6.3 mm (♂) and 7.6 (♀). See Tables 1 and 2A, 2B for selected external and skull measurements. ○ = Female □ = Male Ecology. The only two specimens representing this species were captured at 85 m elevation in magkono (ironwood) forest (Xanthostemon verdugonianus) and in regenerating transitional lowland-montane forest at 1400 m on Mt. Hilong-hilong, the highest mountain in northeastern Mindanao and a Key Biodiversity Area (Mallari et al. 2001). Home to endemic birds, mammals, and amphibians (Plaza & Sanguila 2015, Gracia et al. 2021), Mt. Hilonghilong was identified in 2014 by Bird Life International as an Important Bird and Biodiversity Area in Danger. Distribution. Currently known only from two localities in NE Mindanao, associated with the Hilong-hilong Mountain Range (Fig.1). They probably occur elsewhere in this area. Genetic Analyses. Cytochrome b and Dby sequences are available on GenBank for specimens listed in Appendices 2 and 3. Murina hilonghilong is one of three divergent lineages supported by Dby data (one site, Fig. 2) from the Philippines that is closely related to M. cyclotis from mainland Asia. Relative divergences among Philippine species are discussed below.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies→French-language works237,207→