MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W70976452 · doi:10.1182/blood.v122.21.70.70

A Phase 1/2 Study Of Blinatumomab In Pediatric Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2013· article· en· W70976452 sur OpenAlexaff
Arend von Stackelberg, Gerhard Zugmaier, Rupert Handgretinger, Franco Locatelli, Carmelo Rizzari, Tanya Trippett, Arndt Borkhardt, Susan R. Rheingold, Peter Bader, Deepa Bhojwani, Todd M. Cooper, Steven G. DuBois, Maureen M. O’Brien, C. Michel Zwaan, Chris Holland, Noemi Mergen, Anja Fischer, Min Zhu, Youssef Hijazi, James A. Whitlock, Lia Gore

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Établissements canadiensHospital for Sick Children
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBlinatumomabMedicineRefractory (planetary science)Cytokine release syndromeInternal medicineAcute lymphocytic leukemiaHematopoietic stem cell transplantationBone marrowToxicityPhases of clinical researchClinical endpointGastroenterologyLeukemiaOncologyTransplantationClinical trialLymphoblastic LeukemiaImmunotherapyCancer

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Novel approaches are needed to treat pediatric relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody that has shown remission in an exploratory study of 36 adult patients with relapsed/refractory ALL. Primary toxicities in adults have been cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and central nervous system (CNS) related toxicity. We initiated a phase 1/2 multicenter study to identify, in the phase 1 part, the optimal dose of blinatumomab in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL. Methods In this ongoing study, eligible patients are <18 years old and must have BCP-ALL that is refractory, in second or later bone marrow relapse, or in any marrow relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Blinatumomab is administered by continuous intravenous infusion over 28 days, followed by a 14-day treatment-free interval (up to five cycles). Data from the five doses that have been explored to date are presented. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD), defined as the highest dose level with less than two of six patients experiencing dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) within the first treatment cycle, is the primary endpoint in the phase 1 part of the study (rolling 6 design). Serum samples were collected for pharmacokinetics evaluation and cytokine measurement. Results In the phase 1 part of the study, 34 patients received a total of 56 cycles. Six (18%) patients had refractory disease and 6 (18%) had experienced at least two bone marrow relapses. Twenty-two (65%) patients had relapsed following HSCT. DLTs for dose levels 1 through 4 are summarized in the Table. The MTD for this patient population was established at 15 µg/m²/day. In order to reduce the risk of CRS, a dose of 5 µg/m²/day for 7 days escalating to 15 µg/m²/day for the remainder of the first cycle and all following cycles (5→15 µg/m²/day; dose level 5) was evaluated as recommended dose. None of the 11 patients treated at this dose level developed CRS and no grade 3 CNS-related adverse events (AEs) occurred. Across dose levels, the most common AEs regardless of causality were pyrexia (62% of patients), headache (35%), anemia (29%), and hypertension (29%). One patient treated at 5 µg/m²/day had a grade 3 seizure at the beginning of the second treatment cycle, which resolved clinically and showed no changes on MRI. Across all dose levels, 11 (32%) patients had complete remission (CR), one (3%) had hypocellular blast-free bone marrow, and two (6%) had partial remission within the first two treatment cycles, for an overall response rate of 41%. Some efficacy assessments are still ongoing, and full response data for the phase 1 part of the study will be available at the time of presentation. Two patients experienced hematologic relapse (one each at dose levels 2 and 3, during the fifth and third cycles, respectively). Pharmacokinetic parameters, such as steady-state concentration (Css) and clearance, appeared to be similar to those from adult patients with relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL who received body surface area-based blinatumomab dosing. Transient elevations of serum cytokines were observed mainly in the first two days after infusion start, in particular IL-6, IFN-gamma, IL-10, and, to a lesser extent, IL-2 and TNF-α. Conclusions In the ongoing phase 1 part of this study in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL, a dose of 15 µg/m²/day was established as MTD. Cytokine-release syndrome has been dose-limiting. Pharmacokinetic analysis at the recommended dose of 5→15 µg/m²/day is ongoing. This dose de-escalation strategy has been successful in ameliorating severe CRS to date. Blinatumomab treatment has shown promising antitumor activity in this relapsed/refractory patient population. Disclosures: von Stackelberg: Amgen Inc.: Honoraria. Zugmaier:Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Rheingold:Novartis: Research Funding. Holland:Amgen Inc.: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Mergen:Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Fischer:Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Zhu:Amgen Inc.: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Hijazi:Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Gore:Amgen Inc.: Travel expenses paid for DSMC meeting (Feb 2013) Other.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,421
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,244 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations28
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchTravaux en français237 207