MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7106017768 · doi:10.7939/83409

Optimizing Window Shading Systems for Energy Efficiency in Cold Climate Zones: An integrated approach using In-Situ Testing, Numerical Modelling, and Performance Analysis

2025· dissertation· en· W7106017768 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésShadingEfficient energy useBuilding energy simulationASHRAE 90.1ThermalEnergy consumptionSolar gainWindow (computing)Thermal transmittance

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The transition to sustainable building practices necessitates innovative solutions to reduce energy consumption, particularly in cold climate zones where heating demands dominate. Windows, as critical yet thermally inefficient components of building envelopes, account for significant heat loss and solar gain. Adopting the fabric first approach towards improving building energy efficiency, shading attachments such as roller shades, cellular shades, venetian blinds are identified as cost-effective solutions to mitigate the impact of windows on energy consumption of buildings. This study addresses the dual challenge of quantifying real-world thermal performance of windows with shading attachments and optimizing automated shading control strategies to maximize energy savings in Canadian cold climates. Through an integrated approach combining in-situ testing, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and building energy simulations, the research evaluates the impact of shading systems on heating and cooling loads across diverse climatic conditions. Field experiments conducted in an Edmonton office space measured the in situ thermal transmittance (U-value) of double-pane windows under unshaded, fully shaded, and partially shaded conditions. Results revealed that windows often overperform under extreme cold, with measured U-values decreasing by 15–20% compared to ASHRAE standards at temperature differences exceeding 20°C. Curve fitting analysis revealed that an exponential relationship best describes the relationship between U-value and outdoor temperature. Roller shades stabilized thermal performance, demonstrating not dependence on outdoor conditions, with fully closed shades achieving an average 11.25% reduction in heating loads over a decade when incorporating the temperature dependency of U-values in unshaded position. CFD simulations revealed a minimum optimal shade-to-window distances (25 mm) for enhanced insulation while minimizing convective heat loss. Crucially, incorporating temperature-dependent U-values into energy models reduced average heating load over 4 months by 23%, underscoring the importance of real-world performance data in bridging the gap between theoretical and actual building efficiency. This difference stood at 7% for the small office building, indicating the effect of Window to Wall ratio on the difference between expected and actual performance. Building energy simulations using EnergyPlus expanded the analysis to a prototype small office building across five Canadian cities (Vancouver, Toronto, Quebec City, Edmonton, Yellowknife). Six automated shading control strategies were tested with four shading types: blackout roller shades, cellular shades, and roller shades with 3% and 10% openness. Key findings highlighted the superior performance of dynamic control strategies over static operation. Seasonal adaptive strategies (CS3) reduced heating loads by up to 22% by retracting shades during high solar gain in winter, while heat-flow-based strategies (CS4) balanced heating and cooling savings, achieving reductions of 19% and 47%, respectively. Cellular shades emerged as the most effective for heating load reduction due to their low U-value (1.29 W/m²K), whereas blackout roller shades excelled in cooling load reduction through their low solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC: 0.22). Climate-specific variations were pronounced: Yellowknife, with its subarctic climate, saw the highest absolute energy savings, while Vancouver’s mild winters limited relative gains. Intermediate shading positions, though rarely optimal in simulations, showed potential for sensor-based real-world applications. The study underscores the role of automated shading systems in achieving net-zero goals. Static shading often increased heating demands, emphasizing the need for adaptive controls. For instance, always-shaded configurations in Quebec City raised heating energy use by 9%, while CS4 strategies mitigated this by aligning shade operation with real-time heat flow calculations. The research also identified critical performance gaps, with windows in older buildings exceeding modern energy codes, necessitating retrofits that balance cost, disruption, and efficiency. In conclusion, this work demonstrates that interior shading systems, when paired with climate-responsive automation, significantly enhance energy efficiency in cold climates. By integrating empirical data into building models, the study provides actionable insights for policymakers and designers to optimize retrofit strategies. Future research should explore sensor-driven dynamic controls, occupant interaction, and the integration of shading systems with renewable energy sources to further advance decarbonization efforts in the built environment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,018

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,181
Écart entre enseignants0,169 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationTravaux en français237 207