MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7106017768 · doi:10.7939/83409

Optimizing Window Shading Systems for Energy Efficiency in Cold Climate Zones: An integrated approach using In-Situ Testing, Numerical Modelling, and Performance Analysis

2025· dissertation· en· W7106017768 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShadingEfficient energy useBuilding energy simulationASHRAE 90.1ThermalEnergy consumptionSolar gainWindow (computing)Thermal transmittance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transition to sustainable building practices necessitates innovative solutions to reduce energy consumption, particularly in cold climate zones where heating demands dominate. Windows, as critical yet thermally inefficient components of building envelopes, account for significant heat loss and solar gain. Adopting the fabric first approach towards improving building energy efficiency, shading attachments such as roller shades, cellular shades, venetian blinds are identified as cost-effective solutions to mitigate the impact of windows on energy consumption of buildings. This study addresses the dual challenge of quantifying real-world thermal performance of windows with shading attachments and optimizing automated shading control strategies to maximize energy savings in Canadian cold climates. Through an integrated approach combining in-situ testing, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and building energy simulations, the research evaluates the impact of shading systems on heating and cooling loads across diverse climatic conditions. Field experiments conducted in an Edmonton office space measured the in situ thermal transmittance (U-value) of double-pane windows under unshaded, fully shaded, and partially shaded conditions. Results revealed that windows often overperform under extreme cold, with measured U-values decreasing by 15–20% compared to ASHRAE standards at temperature differences exceeding 20°C. Curve fitting analysis revealed that an exponential relationship best describes the relationship between U-value and outdoor temperature. Roller shades stabilized thermal performance, demonstrating not dependence on outdoor conditions, with fully closed shades achieving an average 11.25% reduction in heating loads over a decade when incorporating the temperature dependency of U-values in unshaded position. CFD simulations revealed a minimum optimal shade-to-window distances (25 mm) for enhanced insulation while minimizing convective heat loss. Crucially, incorporating temperature-dependent U-values into energy models reduced average heating load over 4 months by 23%, underscoring the importance of real-world performance data in bridging the gap between theoretical and actual building efficiency. This difference stood at 7% for the small office building, indicating the effect of Window to Wall ratio on the difference between expected and actual performance. Building energy simulations using EnergyPlus expanded the analysis to a prototype small office building across five Canadian cities (Vancouver, Toronto, Quebec City, Edmonton, Yellowknife). Six automated shading control strategies were tested with four shading types: blackout roller shades, cellular shades, and roller shades with 3% and 10% openness. Key findings highlighted the superior performance of dynamic control strategies over static operation. Seasonal adaptive strategies (CS3) reduced heating loads by up to 22% by retracting shades during high solar gain in winter, while heat-flow-based strategies (CS4) balanced heating and cooling savings, achieving reductions of 19% and 47%, respectively. Cellular shades emerged as the most effective for heating load reduction due to their low U-value (1.29 W/m²K), whereas blackout roller shades excelled in cooling load reduction through their low solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC: 0.22). Climate-specific variations were pronounced: Yellowknife, with its subarctic climate, saw the highest absolute energy savings, while Vancouver’s mild winters limited relative gains. Intermediate shading positions, though rarely optimal in simulations, showed potential for sensor-based real-world applications. The study underscores the role of automated shading systems in achieving net-zero goals. Static shading often increased heating demands, emphasizing the need for adaptive controls. For instance, always-shaded configurations in Quebec City raised heating energy use by 9%, while CS4 strategies mitigated this by aligning shade operation with real-time heat flow calculations. The research also identified critical performance gaps, with windows in older buildings exceeding modern energy codes, necessitating retrofits that balance cost, disruption, and efficiency. In conclusion, this work demonstrates that interior shading systems, when paired with climate-responsive automation, significantly enhance energy efficiency in cold climates. By integrating empirical data into building models, the study provides actionable insights for policymakers and designers to optimize retrofit strategies. Future research should explore sensor-driven dynamic controls, occupant interaction, and the integration of shading systems with renewable energy sources to further advance decarbonization efforts in the built environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207