MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7108456461 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-8151

Elranatamab real-world step-up dosing patterns in relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma patients: Interim analysis Results of the AMbreLA study

2025· article· en· W7108456461 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensCascades (Canada)Hotel Dieu Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInterim analysisAdverse effectDosingInterimObservational studyMallinckrodtMultiple myeloma

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Elranatamab (ELRA) is a humanized, bispecific antibody that targets both B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) on multiple myeloma (MM) cells and CD3 on T cells, with the aim of inducing T cell–mediated cytolysis of the MM cells. ELRA was approved in the US and EU in 2023 as monotherapy for the treatment of triple-class exposed relapsed-refractory MM based on the phase II MagnetisMM-3 (NCT04649359) registrational study. ELRA started with 2 step-up priming doses (SUD): 12 mg on day 1 and 32 mg on day 4 of cycle 1 followed by the initial 76 mg dose. The aim here is to report ELRA SUD patterns and related CRS and ICANS in the real-world settings. Methods AMbreLA (EUPAS1000000074) is an observational ambispective study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ELRA in the real-world setting in adult patients who initiated ELRA in France from May 2023 to September 2025, as part of the early access program. Only retrospective and ambispective patients (no prospective-only patients) were selected for this first interim analysis to ensure a longer follow-up period. Adverse events (AEs) occurring prior to patient inclusion are collected only if they are related to a Pfizer product, while AEs occurring after inclusion are collected regardless of whether they are related to a Pfizer product. The results presented here are part of the first interim analysis with a data cut-off of February 28, 2025, and will be updated with data cut-off planned on July 31, 2025. We descriptively analyzed patient and disease characteristics, prior line(s) of therapy, SUD patterns, incidence of CRS and ICANS and overall response rate (ORR). Results These results will be updated for the poster presentation to include approximately 80 patients from 31 medical centers A total of 28 patients from 13 centers who received ELRA between June 29, 2023, and December 23, 2024, were included in this analysis. The median (95% CI) follow-up was 9.9 (6.1-13.9) months. Median (Q1-Q3) age was 71.5 (66.5-74.5) years; 25% were aged ≥75 years. 57.1% were male. Median time from first MM diagnosis to ELRA initiation was 9.2 (4.6-12.3) years. 60.7% of patients had at least one comorbidity at ELRA initiation, 35.7% had hypertension, 21.4% had renal impairment/failure, and 10.7% had peripheral neuropathy. 37.5% of patients had an ECOG-PS ≥2 and 68.4% had an ISS of II or III. 35.7% had extramedullary disease and, among patients with genetic screening available (n=17/28), 3 (17.6 %) harbored del(17p). Patients received a median of 5 (range, 2-12) prior lines of therapy. 96.4% were triple-class exposed, 67.9% were penta-class exposed, and 6 (21.4%) had received prior BCMA-directed therapy, of whom 5 had received CAR-T cell therapy and 1 had received both an antibody-drug conjugate and a BCMA bispecific. 23.3% of the patients received ELRA in out-patient hospitalization setting, during or after the SUD schedule, the others were treated in conventional hospitalization. All patients completed SUD schedule except for 1 who progressed after the second dose. Median time from SUD 1 to 2, 2 to 3 and 1 to 3 was 3.0 (3.0-4.0), 4.0 (3.0-4.5) and 7.0 (7.0-8.0) days, respectively. 67.9% of patients started the full dose (76 mg) on or before day 8. 28 (100%) patients received per-label recommended pre-medication. CRS was observed in 46.4% of patients, and no serious CRS was reported, whereas 2 ICANS were reported in 1 patient (including 1 SAE). CRS occurred after doses 1 (71.4%), 2 (21.4%), and 3 (7.1%). Recurrent CRS and ICANS occurred in 1 patient. Median time to onset of CRS and ICANS was 3.0 (2.0-3.8) and 11.5 (6.8-16.2) days, respectively. Median time to resolution of CRS and ICANS was 2.5 (2.0-4.0) and 8.0 (8.0-8.0) days, respectively. No patient permanently discontinued ELRA treatment due to CRS or ICANS. Overall, 21 (75%) patients experienced at least 1 AE including 6 (21.4%) who had at least 1 SAE. 5 (17.9%) patients had an AE leading to treatment discontinuation. ORR was reached by 17 patients. VGPR or better was achieved by 16 patients. Median time to VGPR or better was 1.9 (0.9-4.2) months. Conclusions These preliminary results of the AMbreLA study provide an accurate picture of real-world SUD patterns. It confirms that the adapted ELRA SUD schedule and per-label recommended premedication is associated with good management of CRS and ICANS. More patients with longer follow-up are needed to update these data, as real-world profiles and treatment patterns may evolve over time.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,058

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,004
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,316
Écart entre enseignants0,295 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→