MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7108456461 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-8151

Elranatamab real-world step-up dosing patterns in relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma patients: Interim analysis Results of the AMbreLA study

2025· article· en· W7108456461 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCascades (Canada)Hotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterim analysisAdverse effectDosingInterimObservational studyMallinckrodtMultiple myeloma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Elranatamab (ELRA) is a humanized, bispecific antibody that targets both B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) on multiple myeloma (MM) cells and CD3 on T cells, with the aim of inducing T cell–mediated cytolysis of the MM cells. ELRA was approved in the US and EU in 2023 as monotherapy for the treatment of triple-class exposed relapsed-refractory MM based on the phase II MagnetisMM-3 (NCT04649359) registrational study. ELRA started with 2 step-up priming doses (SUD): 12 mg on day 1 and 32 mg on day 4 of cycle 1 followed by the initial 76 mg dose. The aim here is to report ELRA SUD patterns and related CRS and ICANS in the real-world settings. Methods AMbreLA (EUPAS1000000074) is an observational ambispective study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ELRA in the real-world setting in adult patients who initiated ELRA in France from May 2023 to September 2025, as part of the early access program. Only retrospective and ambispective patients (no prospective-only patients) were selected for this first interim analysis to ensure a longer follow-up period. Adverse events (AEs) occurring prior to patient inclusion are collected only if they are related to a Pfizer product, while AEs occurring after inclusion are collected regardless of whether they are related to a Pfizer product. The results presented here are part of the first interim analysis with a data cut-off of February 28, 2025, and will be updated with data cut-off planned on July 31, 2025. We descriptively analyzed patient and disease characteristics, prior line(s) of therapy, SUD patterns, incidence of CRS and ICANS and overall response rate (ORR). Results These results will be updated for the poster presentation to include approximately 80 patients from 31 medical centers A total of 28 patients from 13 centers who received ELRA between June 29, 2023, and December 23, 2024, were included in this analysis. The median (95% CI) follow-up was 9.9 (6.1-13.9) months. Median (Q1-Q3) age was 71.5 (66.5-74.5) years; 25% were aged ≥75 years. 57.1% were male. Median time from first MM diagnosis to ELRA initiation was 9.2 (4.6-12.3) years. 60.7% of patients had at least one comorbidity at ELRA initiation, 35.7% had hypertension, 21.4% had renal impairment/failure, and 10.7% had peripheral neuropathy. 37.5% of patients had an ECOG-PS ≥2 and 68.4% had an ISS of II or III. 35.7% had extramedullary disease and, among patients with genetic screening available (n=17/28), 3 (17.6 %) harbored del(17p). Patients received a median of 5 (range, 2-12) prior lines of therapy. 96.4% were triple-class exposed, 67.9% were penta-class exposed, and 6 (21.4%) had received prior BCMA-directed therapy, of whom 5 had received CAR-T cell therapy and 1 had received both an antibody-drug conjugate and a BCMA bispecific. 23.3% of the patients received ELRA in out-patient hospitalization setting, during or after the SUD schedule, the others were treated in conventional hospitalization. All patients completed SUD schedule except for 1 who progressed after the second dose. Median time from SUD 1 to 2, 2 to 3 and 1 to 3 was 3.0 (3.0-4.0), 4.0 (3.0-4.5) and 7.0 (7.0-8.0) days, respectively. 67.9% of patients started the full dose (76 mg) on or before day 8. 28 (100%) patients received per-label recommended pre-medication. CRS was observed in 46.4% of patients, and no serious CRS was reported, whereas 2 ICANS were reported in 1 patient (including 1 SAE). CRS occurred after doses 1 (71.4%), 2 (21.4%), and 3 (7.1%). Recurrent CRS and ICANS occurred in 1 patient. Median time to onset of CRS and ICANS was 3.0 (2.0-3.8) and 11.5 (6.8-16.2) days, respectively. Median time to resolution of CRS and ICANS was 2.5 (2.0-4.0) and 8.0 (8.0-8.0) days, respectively. No patient permanently discontinued ELRA treatment due to CRS or ICANS. Overall, 21 (75%) patients experienced at least 1 AE including 6 (21.4%) who had at least 1 SAE. 5 (17.9%) patients had an AE leading to treatment discontinuation. ORR was reached by 17 patients. VGPR or better was achieved by 16 patients. Median time to VGPR or better was 1.9 (0.9-4.2) months. Conclusions These preliminary results of the AMbreLA study provide an accurate picture of real-world SUD patterns. It confirms that the adapted ELRA SUD schedule and per-label recommended premedication is associated with good management of CRS and ICANS. More patients with longer follow-up are needed to update these data, as real-world profiles and treatment patterns may evolve over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→