MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7108607412 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-5117

Efficacy of single-agent subcutaneous blinatumomab in adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL): Results from a phase 1/2 dose expansion study with extended follow-up

2025· article· en· W7108607412 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBlinatumomabClinical endpointPhases of clinical researchPharmacokineticsRefractory (planetary science)Minimal residual diseaseHematopoietic stem cell transplantationAdverse effectAcute lymphocytic leukemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Blinatumomab, a BiTE® (bispecific T-cell engager) molecule, is an effective treatment for relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) when administered as a 28-day continuous intravenous infusion (cIV). Results from the dose escalation, dose expansion, and pharmacokinetic evaluation parts of this phase 1/2 study of subcutaneous (SC) blinatumomab demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and high efficacy of two selected doses (NCT04521231; Jabbour et al, Lancet Haematol 2025). In this study, we present updated efficacy outcomes with an additional 7 months of follow-up for all patients who were enrolled and received at least one dose of SC blinatumomab. Methods: In this multicenter phase 1/2 study, adult patients with R/R B-ALL received single-agent SC blinatumomab injection (0.3–1.2 mL) at two doses, either 250 µg once-daily (QD) for week 1 of cycle 1 followed by 500 µg thrice-weekly (TIW) (250/500 cohort) or 500 µg QD during week 1 followed by 1000 µg TIW (500/1000 cohort). Each cycle included 4 weeks of treatment and a 1-week treatment-free interval. Patients were to receive 2–5 cycles. Subsequent treatments, including hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) were collected in long-term follow-up (LTFU), which lasted two years following the first dose of SC blinatumomab. The primary endpoint in dose expansion was complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) within two cycles. Key secondary endpoints were measurable residual disease (MRD) response rate, overall survival (OS) from the first dose of SC blinatumomab, HSCT status, relapse rate, and duration of response (DoR). Results: As of July 3, 2025, 79 patients (median age: 52 years; females: 38%) were treated with SC blinatumomab and enrolled in cohorts which included LTFU; 31 in the 250/500 cohort and 48 in the 500/1000 cohort. At baseline, patients had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range, 1–7), which included cIV blinatumomab in 17 (22%), chimeric antigen receptor T-cells in 14 (18%), HSCT in 23 (29%), and inotuzumab ozogamicin in 26 (33%) patients. Fifteen patients (19%) had Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) B-ALL. Twelve patients (15%) were refractory to frontline therapy. Median bone marrow blast percentage was 65% (range, 5%–98%). Patients received a median of 2 cycles (range, 1–5). CR/CRh was achieved within two cycles in 61/79 patients (77%); 23/31 (74%) in 250/500 cohort and 38/48 (79%) in 500/1000 cohort. A total of 20 (87%) and 34 (89%) of CR/CRh responders in 250/500 and 500/1000 cohorts, respectively, were negative for MRD (<10-4; qPCR or flow cytometry). At a median follow-up of 13.7 months, the estimated 12-month OS rate (N=79) was 69.1% (95% CI: 57.1%, 78.3%) overall. In the 250/500 and 500/1000 cohorts, the median follow-up was 11.4 and 16.3 months with estimated 12-month OS rates of 72.3% (95% CI: 52.1%, 85.1%) and 67.4% (95% CI: 51.7%, 79.0%), respectively. No new safety signals were reported. Among CR/CRh responders, the estimated 12-month OS rate was 80.2% (95% CI: 61.0%, 90.6%) in the patients who received HSCT (n=32; median age, 43 yrs; ≥55 yrs, 13%; Ph+, 16%) after treatment and 85.2% (95% CI: 65.2%, 94.2%) in those who did not receive HSCT (n=29; median age, 63 yrs; ≥55 yrs, 69%; Ph+, 24%). At data cutoff, 25 (78%) of CR/CRh responders who received HSCT were alive. Causes of death post-HSCT were leukemia (n=4), sepsis (n=1), cardiac arrest (n=1), and unknown (n=1). Among responders who did not receive HSCT, 22 (76%) were alive, 5 died (4 due to leukemia and 1 due to COVID-19), 1 was lost to follow-up, and 1 withdrew consent. The median (range) DoR among CR/CRh responders was 18.4 (1.2–18.4) months overall, 18.4 months (3.2–18.4) in the 250/500 cohort and not estimable (NE) (1.2–11.0 months) in the 500/1000 cohort. Of the CR/CRh responders in the 250/500 and 500/1000 cohorts, respectively, 17 (74%) and 29 (76%) were alive without relapse at the last disease assessment date. Conclusion: Consistent with prior findings, single-agent SC blinatumomab maintained durable remissions and OS in this extended follow-up analysis. These outcomes were observed across the 250/500 and 500/1000 doses and were independent of HSCT status. Compared to our previous report, this analysis includes additional follow-up and updated post-HSCT outcomes. These data support the continued development of SC blinatumomab as an effective treatment option for patients with R/R B-ALL.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,009

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,272
Écart entre enseignants0,260 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchTravaux en français237 207