MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7108607412 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-5117

Efficacy of single-agent subcutaneous blinatumomab in adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL): Results from a phase 1/2 dose expansion study with extended follow-up

2025· article· en· W7108607412 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlinatumomabClinical endpointPhases of clinical researchPharmacokineticsRefractory (planetary science)Minimal residual diseaseHematopoietic stem cell transplantationAdverse effectAcute lymphocytic leukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Blinatumomab, a BiTE® (bispecific T-cell engager) molecule, is an effective treatment for relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) when administered as a 28-day continuous intravenous infusion (cIV). Results from the dose escalation, dose expansion, and pharmacokinetic evaluation parts of this phase 1/2 study of subcutaneous (SC) blinatumomab demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and high efficacy of two selected doses (NCT04521231; Jabbour et al, Lancet Haematol 2025). In this study, we present updated efficacy outcomes with an additional 7 months of follow-up for all patients who were enrolled and received at least one dose of SC blinatumomab. Methods: In this multicenter phase 1/2 study, adult patients with R/R B-ALL received single-agent SC blinatumomab injection (0.3–1.2 mL) at two doses, either 250 µg once-daily (QD) for week 1 of cycle 1 followed by 500 µg thrice-weekly (TIW) (250/500 cohort) or 500 µg QD during week 1 followed by 1000 µg TIW (500/1000 cohort). Each cycle included 4 weeks of treatment and a 1-week treatment-free interval. Patients were to receive 2–5 cycles. Subsequent treatments, including hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) were collected in long-term follow-up (LTFU), which lasted two years following the first dose of SC blinatumomab. The primary endpoint in dose expansion was complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) within two cycles. Key secondary endpoints were measurable residual disease (MRD) response rate, overall survival (OS) from the first dose of SC blinatumomab, HSCT status, relapse rate, and duration of response (DoR). Results: As of July 3, 2025, 79 patients (median age: 52 years; females: 38%) were treated with SC blinatumomab and enrolled in cohorts which included LTFU; 31 in the 250/500 cohort and 48 in the 500/1000 cohort. At baseline, patients had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range, 1–7), which included cIV blinatumomab in 17 (22%), chimeric antigen receptor T-cells in 14 (18%), HSCT in 23 (29%), and inotuzumab ozogamicin in 26 (33%) patients. Fifteen patients (19%) had Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) B-ALL. Twelve patients (15%) were refractory to frontline therapy. Median bone marrow blast percentage was 65% (range, 5%–98%). Patients received a median of 2 cycles (range, 1–5). CR/CRh was achieved within two cycles in 61/79 patients (77%); 23/31 (74%) in 250/500 cohort and 38/48 (79%) in 500/1000 cohort. A total of 20 (87%) and 34 (89%) of CR/CRh responders in 250/500 and 500/1000 cohorts, respectively, were negative for MRD (<10-4; qPCR or flow cytometry). At a median follow-up of 13.7 months, the estimated 12-month OS rate (N=79) was 69.1% (95% CI: 57.1%, 78.3%) overall. In the 250/500 and 500/1000 cohorts, the median follow-up was 11.4 and 16.3 months with estimated 12-month OS rates of 72.3% (95% CI: 52.1%, 85.1%) and 67.4% (95% CI: 51.7%, 79.0%), respectively. No new safety signals were reported. Among CR/CRh responders, the estimated 12-month OS rate was 80.2% (95% CI: 61.0%, 90.6%) in the patients who received HSCT (n=32; median age, 43 yrs; ≥55 yrs, 13%; Ph+, 16%) after treatment and 85.2% (95% CI: 65.2%, 94.2%) in those who did not receive HSCT (n=29; median age, 63 yrs; ≥55 yrs, 69%; Ph+, 24%). At data cutoff, 25 (78%) of CR/CRh responders who received HSCT were alive. Causes of death post-HSCT were leukemia (n=4), sepsis (n=1), cardiac arrest (n=1), and unknown (n=1). Among responders who did not receive HSCT, 22 (76%) were alive, 5 died (4 due to leukemia and 1 due to COVID-19), 1 was lost to follow-up, and 1 withdrew consent. The median (range) DoR among CR/CRh responders was 18.4 (1.2–18.4) months overall, 18.4 months (3.2–18.4) in the 250/500 cohort and not estimable (NE) (1.2–11.0 months) in the 500/1000 cohort. Of the CR/CRh responders in the 250/500 and 500/1000 cohorts, respectively, 17 (74%) and 29 (76%) were alive without relapse at the last disease assessment date. Conclusion: Consistent with prior findings, single-agent SC blinatumomab maintained durable remissions and OS in this extended follow-up analysis. These outcomes were observed across the 250/500 and 500/1000 doses and were independent of HSCT status. Compared to our previous report, this analysis includes additional follow-up and updated post-HSCT outcomes. These data support the continued development of SC blinatumomab as an effective treatment option for patients with R/R B-ALL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207