MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7108630260 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-3046

Treatment strategies and outcomes in pediatric patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) undergoing surgical procedures: A multicenter study

2025· article· en· W7108630260 sur OpenAlexaffabout

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPerioperativeSplenectomyImmune thrombocytopeniaRetrospective cohort studyCohort studyCohortAdenoidectomyTonsillectomyCytopenia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) may have an increased risk of perioperative bleeding. However, current ITP guidelines do not address this risk, and studies of surgical management of suspected bleeding disorders often exclude ITP patients. In this multicenter study, we examined perioperative management and outcomes in a cohort of children with ITP who underwent four common surgeries. We aimed to describe perioperative management and outcomes by platelet count, type of surgery, and ITP-directed treatment strategies. Methods: In conjunction with the ITP Consortium of North America (ICON), we conducted an IRB-approved retrospective chart review of patients with ITP aged 0-24 years who underwent tooth extraction, tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A), appendectomy, and/or splenectomy at six centers in the United States and Canada between 2019-2024. Patients were excluded if ITP was resolved at the time of surgical planning (defined as platelet count >150 x 109/L on two occasions or on one occasion with a normal mean platelet volume, in the absence of ITP-directed therapy). Results:Fifty-six patients underwent 61 surgical procedures. Median age at time of surgery was 14 years (range 3-24). Most patients (84%; 47/56) had chronic ITP, and 44% (27/61) of patients were receiving baseline ITP-directed treatments (range: 0-6 treatments) at the time surgery was recommended. Additional perioperative ITP-directed treatment was recommended for 52% (32/61) of surgeries, typically 1 (44%), 2 (47%), or rarely ≥3 treatments (9%). The most common surgery was tooth extraction(s), with 50% (18/36) of patients receiving perioperative treatment, including antifibrinolytics (n=12), corticosteroids (n=8), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (n=4), and/or thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) (n=4). Most patients undergoing splenectomy (80%; 8/10) received treatment, including corticosteroids (n=5), IVIG (n=5), TPO-RA (n=1), and/or platelet transfusion (n=1). A third (3/9) of patients undergoing appendectomy received treatment, including IVIG (n=3), corticosteroids (n=1), and/or platelet transfusion (n=1). Half of patients (3/6) undergoing T&A received treatment, including IVIG (n=2), corticosteroid (n=1), antifibrinolytic (n=1), and/or platelet transfusion (n=1). Across all surgeries, 83% (15/18) of patients with platelet counts <50 x 109/L received perioperative treatment, compared to 53% (9/17) with platelet counts 50-99 x 109/L, and 33% (8/24) with platelet counts ≥100 x 109/L. At the time of surgery, 93% of patients had platelet counts ≥50 x 109/L (53/57); one patient had a platelet count of 1 x 109/L, and three had platelet counts 30-49 x 109/L. There were two perioperative bleeding events (3%; 2/58), both related to tooth extractions. In the first case, the patient with a platelet count of 1 x 109/L had severe bleeding at the site of extraction requiring emergent intervention. Hematology was not aware of the procedure, and no additional perioperative ITP treatment was provided. The second patient had a platelet count of 69 x 109/L and had self-limited bleeding at the site of extraction; this patient had received an antifibrinolytic for dual management of perioperative bleeding risk and heavy menses. Hematology was consulted perioperatively in 89% (49/55) of cases. Hospital admission was reported for 30% (18/61) of surgeries, and 10% (6/59) of patients had unanticipated hospital admissions (n=1) or emergency room visits (n=5; of which only 1 was likely ITP-related) within 28 days of surgery. Medication side effects were reported in 7% of patients receiving ITP-directed therapies (3/43); all three patients experienced headaches. Conclusions: In this study of 61 surgeries, 52% of pediatric patients with ITP were given perioperative ITP-directed treatments, most commonly antifibrinolytics, IVIG, and corticosteroids. Treatment was prescribed for almost half of patients with a platelet count ≥50 x 109/L at the time surgery was recommended. Notably, only two patients had bleeding events, of which one had a platelet count ≥50 x 109/L. Our findings suggest that children with ITP with higher platelet counts are generally at low risk of procedural bleeding. Variable management strategies were used, which may represent the heterogeneity of the disease and variable responses to emergent therapies. Future validation studies should examine perioperative ITP management and resource utilization in larger cohorts.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,267
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→