MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7108630260 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-3046

Treatment strategies and outcomes in pediatric patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) undergoing surgical procedures: A multicenter study

2025· article· en· W7108630260 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerioperativeSplenectomyImmune thrombocytopeniaRetrospective cohort studyCohort studyCohortAdenoidectomyTonsillectomyCytopenia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) may have an increased risk of perioperative bleeding. However, current ITP guidelines do not address this risk, and studies of surgical management of suspected bleeding disorders often exclude ITP patients. In this multicenter study, we examined perioperative management and outcomes in a cohort of children with ITP who underwent four common surgeries. We aimed to describe perioperative management and outcomes by platelet count, type of surgery, and ITP-directed treatment strategies. Methods: In conjunction with the ITP Consortium of North America (ICON), we conducted an IRB-approved retrospective chart review of patients with ITP aged 0-24 years who underwent tooth extraction, tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A), appendectomy, and/or splenectomy at six centers in the United States and Canada between 2019-2024. Patients were excluded if ITP was resolved at the time of surgical planning (defined as platelet count >150 x 109/L on two occasions or on one occasion with a normal mean platelet volume, in the absence of ITP-directed therapy). Results:Fifty-six patients underwent 61 surgical procedures. Median age at time of surgery was 14 years (range 3-24). Most patients (84%; 47/56) had chronic ITP, and 44% (27/61) of patients were receiving baseline ITP-directed treatments (range: 0-6 treatments) at the time surgery was recommended. Additional perioperative ITP-directed treatment was recommended for 52% (32/61) of surgeries, typically 1 (44%), 2 (47%), or rarely ≥3 treatments (9%). The most common surgery was tooth extraction(s), with 50% (18/36) of patients receiving perioperative treatment, including antifibrinolytics (n=12), corticosteroids (n=8), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (n=4), and/or thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) (n=4). Most patients undergoing splenectomy (80%; 8/10) received treatment, including corticosteroids (n=5), IVIG (n=5), TPO-RA (n=1), and/or platelet transfusion (n=1). A third (3/9) of patients undergoing appendectomy received treatment, including IVIG (n=3), corticosteroids (n=1), and/or platelet transfusion (n=1). Half of patients (3/6) undergoing T&A received treatment, including IVIG (n=2), corticosteroid (n=1), antifibrinolytic (n=1), and/or platelet transfusion (n=1). Across all surgeries, 83% (15/18) of patients with platelet counts <50 x 109/L received perioperative treatment, compared to 53% (9/17) with platelet counts 50-99 x 109/L, and 33% (8/24) with platelet counts ≥100 x 109/L. At the time of surgery, 93% of patients had platelet counts ≥50 x 109/L (53/57); one patient had a platelet count of 1 x 109/L, and three had platelet counts 30-49 x 109/L. There were two perioperative bleeding events (3%; 2/58), both related to tooth extractions. In the first case, the patient with a platelet count of 1 x 109/L had severe bleeding at the site of extraction requiring emergent intervention. Hematology was not aware of the procedure, and no additional perioperative ITP treatment was provided. The second patient had a platelet count of 69 x 109/L and had self-limited bleeding at the site of extraction; this patient had received an antifibrinolytic for dual management of perioperative bleeding risk and heavy menses. Hematology was consulted perioperatively in 89% (49/55) of cases. Hospital admission was reported for 30% (18/61) of surgeries, and 10% (6/59) of patients had unanticipated hospital admissions (n=1) or emergency room visits (n=5; of which only 1 was likely ITP-related) within 28 days of surgery. Medication side effects were reported in 7% of patients receiving ITP-directed therapies (3/43); all three patients experienced headaches. Conclusions: In this study of 61 surgeries, 52% of pediatric patients with ITP were given perioperative ITP-directed treatments, most commonly antifibrinolytics, IVIG, and corticosteroids. Treatment was prescribed for almost half of patients with a platelet count ≥50 x 109/L at the time surgery was recommended. Notably, only two patients had bleeding events, of which one had a platelet count ≥50 x 109/L. Our findings suggest that children with ITP with higher platelet counts are generally at low risk of procedural bleeding. Variable management strategies were used, which may represent the heterogeneity of the disease and variable responses to emergent therapies. Future validation studies should examine perioperative ITP management and resource utilization in larger cohorts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→