MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7108662280 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-2187

Light-chain MGUS defined as per the revised definition of the istopmm study: Experience from the university of calgary MGUS clinic

2025· article· en· W7108662280 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMonoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significanceMultiple myelomaMonoclonal gammopathyConfidence intervalLymphoproliferative disordersPopulationWaldenstrom macroglobulinemiaProspective cohort study

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined significance (MGUS), the precursor of multiple myeloma (MM) and other lymphoproliferative disorders affects 4.2% of the general population over 50 years of age. A recent study (The Iceland Screens, Treats or Prevents Multiple Myeloma “iStopMM”) evaluated patients with Light chain- MGUS. LC-MGUS was defined as an FLC ratio outside the reference interval with an increase in the involved k or l FLC, without evidence of M protein on SPEP or IFE in the absence of myeloma defining events (Classic LC-MGUS definition). The standard FLC reference intervals (FLC ratio of 0.26-1.65; kFLC range 3.3-19.4 mg/L; and l FLC range, 5.6-26.3 mg/L) were used in cases with eGFR of 60 mL/min/1.73m2. Based on prospective screening of more than 75,000 individuals this group proposed a revision of the reference intervals for serum k FLC, l FLC, and FLC ratio, stratified by age, along with a new definition of LC-MGUS to significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy of this premalignant condition. In the new definition of LC-MGUS, the iStopMM report considered FLC ratio and kFLC and lFLC values based on age and eGFR cut-offs. In the current study, we aimed to describe the frequency of LC-MGUS based on the revised definition, as well as to assess clinical outcomes for patients deemed LC-MGUS with prior reference values. Methods: In 2014, we created a MGUS and MGCS (Monoclonal Gammopathy of Clinical Significance) clinic where patients with a suspected monoclonal gammopathy are assessed. This centralized clinic helped establish a formal evaluation of MGUS cases aimed at offering proper surveillance and investigations to patients with suspected clinically significant disorders. Since the inception of this clinic, patients have been assessed and monitored as per standard local and international guidelines. In the current study, we performed a retrospective chart review in all cases seen at our clinic from 01/2014 to 06/2025 and demographic variables were recorded. Patients with LC-MGUS as per the classical definition were evaluated and later the revised LC-MGUS criteria from the iStopMM study was applied. The primary objective of the study was to explore the clinically validation of the iStopMM criteria for the definition of LC-MGUS and compared with the classical definition. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Survival curves were constructed according to the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from treatment to disease progression or death, while overall survival (OS) was defined from the date of treatment to the date of death from any cause. All statistical analyses were performed by using the SPSS 24.0 software. Results A total of 457 patients with MGUS were evaluated in the study period. Median age was 68.9 years (range 18-95) and 268 were male (58.6%). From those, 103 were considered LC-MGUS based on the classical definition (22.5%). On these cases, 55 (53.4%) had an eGFR>60 mL/min/1.73m2, 19 (18.4%) (45-59 mL/min/1.73m2), 15 (14.6%) (30-44 mL/min/1.73m2) and 14 (13.6%) (<30 mL/min/1.73m2). After the new revised criteria was applied, LC-MGUS was considered present in only 20 cases (4.3%), representing a decrease of 81%. After a median follow up of 55 months, 18 patients in the LC-MGUS as per new criteria are alive. One patient defined as LC-MGUS using the new criteria has progressed from MGUS to SMM (Smouldering Multiple Myeloma) at 5 years from initial diagnosis without progression to symptomatic Multiple Myeloma. There has been no cases of progression to MM, Lymphoma or AL Amyloidosis in cases classified as LC-MGUS with the classic criteria only. Median OS has not been reached among patients classified with LC-MGUS based on the classic criteria and is similar to that seen for patients classified as LC-MGUS with the revised version as defined by the iStopMM group (p=0.2). Conclusion, Implementation of the new sFLC criteria defined as per the iStopMM group decreased the rate of false positive diagnosis of LC-MGUS, particularly for cases with preserved renal function (eGFR>60 mL/min/1.73m2).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,072
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,143

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,292
Écart entre enseignants0,260 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→