Anomocephala rosiegeorgeorum Percy, 2025, sp. nov.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Anomocephala rosiegeorgeorum sp. nov. (Figs 3A–3C, 3F–3N, 3Q–3R, 4A–4C, 4G–4M) Adult colour and structure. General colour probably dark brown or dark red, apical metatarsus dark brown to black; forewing membrane clear in males, females with an irregular band of brown pigmentation (sometimes only faint, especially in teneral females) in the hind margin half of the wing (Figs 3A, 3C). Genal processes long and slender, longer than vertex length (ratio VL:GC 0.70–0.87), contiguous for almost entire length (Figs 3G, 3I, 3K). Antenna approximately 1.5 times longer than head width (ratio AL:HW: 1.47–1.62), segment 3 long, approximately 1/3 antennal length and subequal or longer than segments 6–8 combined, subapical seta longer than either segment 9 or 10 (Fig. 3F). Metacoxa with moderate sized meracanthus, base of metatibia with distinct genual spine or small cluster of ~2 spines, apex slightly expanded, bearing 3 (1+2) sclerotized apical spurs with single spur slightly stalked, and the pair of spurs hardly conjoined (Figs 3L, 3M, 3N). Forewing membrane surface spinules dense, forewing apex bluntly acute (Figs 3A, 3C). Hindwing more than 0.7 times forewing length, apex broadly rounded (Fig. 3B). Male terminalia with subgenital plate well rounded; proctiger short with pronounced posterior lobes basally (Fig. 4A); paramere long and slender, curving slightly towards posterior and apices turned inwards, with simple setae shorter on exterior and longer on interior surfaces (Figs 4A, 4B); distal aedeagus segment apex with moderate sized bulbous head. Female terminalia as given in generic description, in lateral view proctiger dorsal surface more or less straight or somewhat undulating with longer simple setae in apical portion (Figs 4G, 4H, 4I, 4J). Adult measurements (mm) and ratios. (4 males, 7 females). WL: 2.39–2.92; WW: 0.81–1.09; HW: 0.61– 0.69; AL: 0.87–1.12; PB: 0.09–0.10; WL:WW: 2.68–2.95; WL:RsL: 1.83–2.11; CUR: 1.04–1.37; MR: 0.53–0.62; HM:HCU: 1.36–1.88; HW:VW: 1.68–1.85; VL:VW: 0.54–0.74; VL:GC: 0.70–0.87; WL:HW: 3.85–4.36; AL:HW: 1.47–1.62; HW:HT: 0.91–1.23; HT:HF: 1.17–1.34. Male terminalia: MP: 0.22–0.23; PL: 0.35–0.36; AEL: 0.23–0.25; PL:HW: 0.56–0.59; MP:PL: 0.63–0.64; PL:AEL: 1.44–1.52; AEL:AELH: 2.30–2.78; PL:SH: 1.30–1.44. Female terminalia: FP: 0.42–0.52; FSP: 0.32–0.41; RL: 0.15–0.22; OVH: 0.09–0.10; EL: 0.27–0.32; EW: 0.09–0.11; FP: RL: 2.36–2.80; FP:HW: 0.68–0.76; FP:SP: 1.27–1.50; EL:EW: 2.90–3.10. Immature. Unknown. Egg. Oblong-ovoid, approximately 3 times longer than wide, with a short, laterally positioned pedicel subbasally on ventral side (Figs 4K, 4L); dorsal and lateral surface with distinctly hexagonal, honeycomb-like, sculpturing (Figs 4K, 4M); dorsum keeled with a longitudinal medial ridge (Fig. 4K), ventral side concave (Fig. 4L), tail apparently lacking. Host plant. Unconfirmed without immatures, but most adults were collected from Metrosideros collina (Myrtaceae). Comment. The most obvious characters that differentiate A. rosiegeorgeorum from A. unica are used in the species key above, additional differences include smaller meracanthus, metatibia shorter (ratio HT:HF <1.35), base of metatibia with only a single or small cluster of ~2 genual spines, apex of metatibia less expanded, with spurs less stalked or conjoined (Figs 3L, 3M, 3N, 3O, 3P), forewing relatively shorter (ratio WL:HW <4.5) with cell r 1 not narrowing as much towards cell apex, cell cu 1 higher (ratios CUR <1.5 and HM:HCU <2) (Fig. 3A, 3D), hindwing relatively longer (more than 0.7 times forewing length) with a more broadly rounded apex (Figs 3B, 3E), paramere longer and proctiger shorter (ratio MP:PL <0.6) (Figs 4A, 4D). Systematics. This species was included in the mitogenome analysis of Percy et al. (2018) (as “DP2.idba.210_ circ_ Triozidae _ Anomocephala _sp”). The two Anomocephala species on Rapa are strongly supported as sister taxa (100% bootstrap) and are moderately divergent (9.7% COI divergence).See systematics section under Anomocephala and Discussion. Genetic resources. Genbank: MG988637 (COI), MG988913 (cytB). Distribution. Only known from Mt. Perahu on Rapa island, Austral Islands, French Polynesia. Type material. Holotype male (slide mounted), Mt. Perahu ridge, 590 m, ex Metrosideros, 12 Oct. 2002, coll. “vial 3” AnomoRG, R. Gillespie leg. (NHMUK). Paratypes 2 males, 4 females (slide mounted), as for holotype (NHMUK and DMPC). Other material examined. 2 males, 6 females (slide mounted) Mt. Perahu, 650 m, ex Metrosideros, 9 th- 11 th Dec. 2002, coll. “vials 5, 9, 15” RG-Anomo-02, R. Gillespie leg. (DMPC). Etymology. The species name honours two Pacific island biologists, professional and familial partners Rosie Gillespie and George Roderick. Although the only specimens of A. rosiegeorgeorum were collected by Rosie Gillespie, those who have worked with Rosie and George know that all endeavours are joint and that they operate as a symbiotic unit.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».