Anomocephala rosiegeorgeorum Percy, 2025, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anomocephala rosiegeorgeorum sp. nov. (Figs 3A–3C, 3F–3N, 3Q–3R, 4A–4C, 4G–4M) Adult colour and structure. General colour probably dark brown or dark red, apical metatarsus dark brown to black; forewing membrane clear in males, females with an irregular band of brown pigmentation (sometimes only faint, especially in teneral females) in the hind margin half of the wing (Figs 3A, 3C). Genal processes long and slender, longer than vertex length (ratio VL:GC 0.70–0.87), contiguous for almost entire length (Figs 3G, 3I, 3K). Antenna approximately 1.5 times longer than head width (ratio AL:HW: 1.47–1.62), segment 3 long, approximately 1/3 antennal length and subequal or longer than segments 6–8 combined, subapical seta longer than either segment 9 or 10 (Fig. 3F). Metacoxa with moderate sized meracanthus, base of metatibia with distinct genual spine or small cluster of ~2 spines, apex slightly expanded, bearing 3 (1+2) sclerotized apical spurs with single spur slightly stalked, and the pair of spurs hardly conjoined (Figs 3L, 3M, 3N). Forewing membrane surface spinules dense, forewing apex bluntly acute (Figs 3A, 3C). Hindwing more than 0.7 times forewing length, apex broadly rounded (Fig. 3B). Male terminalia with subgenital plate well rounded; proctiger short with pronounced posterior lobes basally (Fig. 4A); paramere long and slender, curving slightly towards posterior and apices turned inwards, with simple setae shorter on exterior and longer on interior surfaces (Figs 4A, 4B); distal aedeagus segment apex with moderate sized bulbous head. Female terminalia as given in generic description, in lateral view proctiger dorsal surface more or less straight or somewhat undulating with longer simple setae in apical portion (Figs 4G, 4H, 4I, 4J). Adult measurements (mm) and ratios. (4 males, 7 females). WL: 2.39–2.92; WW: 0.81–1.09; HW: 0.61– 0.69; AL: 0.87–1.12; PB: 0.09–0.10; WL:WW: 2.68–2.95; WL:RsL: 1.83–2.11; CUR: 1.04–1.37; MR: 0.53–0.62; HM:HCU: 1.36–1.88; HW:VW: 1.68–1.85; VL:VW: 0.54–0.74; VL:GC: 0.70–0.87; WL:HW: 3.85–4.36; AL:HW: 1.47–1.62; HW:HT: 0.91–1.23; HT:HF: 1.17–1.34. Male terminalia: MP: 0.22–0.23; PL: 0.35–0.36; AEL: 0.23–0.25; PL:HW: 0.56–0.59; MP:PL: 0.63–0.64; PL:AEL: 1.44–1.52; AEL:AELH: 2.30–2.78; PL:SH: 1.30–1.44. Female terminalia: FP: 0.42–0.52; FSP: 0.32–0.41; RL: 0.15–0.22; OVH: 0.09–0.10; EL: 0.27–0.32; EW: 0.09–0.11; FP: RL: 2.36–2.80; FP:HW: 0.68–0.76; FP:SP: 1.27–1.50; EL:EW: 2.90–3.10. Immature. Unknown. Egg. Oblong-ovoid, approximately 3 times longer than wide, with a short, laterally positioned pedicel subbasally on ventral side (Figs 4K, 4L); dorsal and lateral surface with distinctly hexagonal, honeycomb-like, sculpturing (Figs 4K, 4M); dorsum keeled with a longitudinal medial ridge (Fig. 4K), ventral side concave (Fig. 4L), tail apparently lacking. Host plant. Unconfirmed without immatures, but most adults were collected from Metrosideros collina (Myrtaceae). Comment. The most obvious characters that differentiate A. rosiegeorgeorum from A. unica are used in the species key above, additional differences include smaller meracanthus, metatibia shorter (ratio HT:HF <1.35), base of metatibia with only a single or small cluster of ~2 genual spines, apex of metatibia less expanded, with spurs less stalked or conjoined (Figs 3L, 3M, 3N, 3O, 3P), forewing relatively shorter (ratio WL:HW <4.5) with cell r 1 not narrowing as much towards cell apex, cell cu 1 higher (ratios CUR <1.5 and HM:HCU <2) (Fig. 3A, 3D), hindwing relatively longer (more than 0.7 times forewing length) with a more broadly rounded apex (Figs 3B, 3E), paramere longer and proctiger shorter (ratio MP:PL <0.6) (Figs 4A, 4D). Systematics. This species was included in the mitogenome analysis of Percy et al. (2018) (as “DP2.idba.210_ circ_ Triozidae _ Anomocephala _sp”). The two Anomocephala species on Rapa are strongly supported as sister taxa (100% bootstrap) and are moderately divergent (9.7% COI divergence).See systematics section under Anomocephala and Discussion. Genetic resources. Genbank: MG988637 (COI), MG988913 (cytB). Distribution. Only known from Mt. Perahu on Rapa island, Austral Islands, French Polynesia. Type material. Holotype male (slide mounted), Mt. Perahu ridge, 590 m, ex Metrosideros, 12 Oct. 2002, coll. “vial 3” AnomoRG, R. Gillespie leg. (NHMUK). Paratypes 2 males, 4 females (slide mounted), as for holotype (NHMUK and DMPC). Other material examined. 2 males, 6 females (slide mounted) Mt. Perahu, 650 m, ex Metrosideros, 9 th- 11 th Dec. 2002, coll. “vials 5, 9, 15” RG-Anomo-02, R. Gillespie leg. (DMPC). Etymology. The species name honours two Pacific island biologists, professional and familial partners Rosie Gillespie and George Roderick. Although the only specimens of A. rosiegeorgeorum were collected by Rosie Gillespie, those who have worked with Rosie and George know that all endeavours are joint and that they operate as a symbiotic unit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".