MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7116363011 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/fwues

Purpose in Life and Everyday Physical Symptoms: Age and Race Differences

2025· other· W7116363011 sur OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Li

Notice bibliographique

RevueOpen Science Framework · 2025
Typeother
Langue
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStressorPsychosocialRace (biology)Vulnerability (computing)PerceptionPurpose in lifeEveryday lifePsychological resilienceAllostatic load

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A growing body of research shows that having a higher sense of purpose in life—defined as an enduring orientation toward valued life goals that organize behavior and engagement in meaningful activities (Ryff, 1989; Scheier et al., 2006)—is associated with lower risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality, as well as fewer daily physical symptoms such as pain, fatigue, and tension (Boyle et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2013; Hill et al., 2018). A proposed mechanism is described by the Resources and Perception Model, which suggests that psychosocial resources such as sense of purpose shape how individuals appraise and respond to stressors (Harber et al., 2008). Consistent with this model, higher purpose has been associated with reduced emotional and physiological reactivity and faster recovery following stress, particularly among older adults (van Reekum et al., 2007; Schaefer et al., 2013; Hill et al., 2018; Polenick et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2019). Together, older adults with a higher sense of purpose tend to perceive stressors as less difficult, are less reactive to such stressors, and recover more quickly after stressors. In contrast, lower purpose may be linked to more frequent, intense, and prolonged stress responses, which can disrupt homeostasis and accumulate over time as allostatic load, increasing vulnerability to chronic disease and functional decline in later life (McEwen, 1998; Kim et al., 2013, 2022). Sense of purpose also varies across sociodemographic groups. Longitudinal research indicates that purpose generally increases into midlife and declines in later adulthood, partly due to reductions in perceived control and fewer opportunities for engagement in personally meaningful activities (Ko et al., 2016; Drewelies et al., 2017; Mann et al., 2019; Dewitte et al., 2024). The Purpose as Trait, Habit, and State (PATHS) model proposes that purpose exists at multiple levels, including a relatively stable sense of purpose and day-to-day experiences of meaning, and that these levels influence one another over time (Hill et al., 2023). Daily diary evidence demonstrates that engagement in culturally meaningful roles is a key source of purpose for Asian populations. Specifically, Asian American youth report higher daily purpose on days when they fulfill culturally valued family and academic roles, such as caregiving responsibilities, whereas days with fewer role-based activities are associated with lower purpose and poorer well-being (Kiang & Fuligni, 2010; Kiang, 2011). Although this evidence focuses on youth, it illustrates how culturally embedded social roles can generate purpose through everyday experiences, a process that may extend into adulthood. At the same time, racialized experiences may undermine purpose in later life. For example, Hill et al. (2021) found that although Native Hawaiian and Japanese American adults experienced higher levels of everyday discrimination than White adults, patterns of purpose and health outcomes diverged across groups: Native Hawaiians reported relatively high purpose and moderate sleep quality despite frequent discrimination, whereas Japanese Americans reported lower purpose and poorer sleep outcomes. These findings suggest that purpose may function as a resilience factor for some Asian and Pacific Islander populations, but not uniformly across groups. Although sense of purpose has been shown to differ across age and racial groups (Kiang & Fuligni, 2010; Ko et al., 2016; Mann et al., 2019), little is known about whether the protective association between purpose and physical health varies across these groups, particularly in the context of daily health experiences. Moreover, much of the existing literature relies on single-time assessments of purpose and health, limiting insight into how purpose relates to health as it naturally unfolds in daily life. Thus, the present study uses data from the Daily Experiences and Health study to test whether individuals with higher purpose report fewer daily physical symptoms; and whether this association differs (1) across younger and older adults and (2) between White and Asian/Pacific Islander participants.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Science ouverte, Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Science ouverte, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,319
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,009
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,014
Communication savante0,0090,002
Science ouverte0,0100,011
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,329
Écart entre enseignants0,310 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOpen Science FrameworkTravaux en français237 207