MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116363011 · doi:10.17605/osf.io/fwues

Purpose in Life and Everyday Physical Symptoms: Age and Race Differences

2025· other· W7116363011 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Li

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Science Framework · 2025
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStressorPsychosocialRace (biology)Vulnerability (computing)PerceptionPurpose in lifeEveryday lifePsychological resilienceAllostatic load

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A growing body of research shows that having a higher sense of purpose in life—defined as an enduring orientation toward valued life goals that organize behavior and engagement in meaningful activities (Ryff, 1989; Scheier et al., 2006)—is associated with lower risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality, as well as fewer daily physical symptoms such as pain, fatigue, and tension (Boyle et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2013; Hill et al., 2018). A proposed mechanism is described by the Resources and Perception Model, which suggests that psychosocial resources such as sense of purpose shape how individuals appraise and respond to stressors (Harber et al., 2008). Consistent with this model, higher purpose has been associated with reduced emotional and physiological reactivity and faster recovery following stress, particularly among older adults (van Reekum et al., 2007; Schaefer et al., 2013; Hill et al., 2018; Polenick et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2019). Together, older adults with a higher sense of purpose tend to perceive stressors as less difficult, are less reactive to such stressors, and recover more quickly after stressors. In contrast, lower purpose may be linked to more frequent, intense, and prolonged stress responses, which can disrupt homeostasis and accumulate over time as allostatic load, increasing vulnerability to chronic disease and functional decline in later life (McEwen, 1998; Kim et al., 2013, 2022). Sense of purpose also varies across sociodemographic groups. Longitudinal research indicates that purpose generally increases into midlife and declines in later adulthood, partly due to reductions in perceived control and fewer opportunities for engagement in personally meaningful activities (Ko et al., 2016; Drewelies et al., 2017; Mann et al., 2019; Dewitte et al., 2024). The Purpose as Trait, Habit, and State (PATHS) model proposes that purpose exists at multiple levels, including a relatively stable sense of purpose and day-to-day experiences of meaning, and that these levels influence one another over time (Hill et al., 2023). Daily diary evidence demonstrates that engagement in culturally meaningful roles is a key source of purpose for Asian populations. Specifically, Asian American youth report higher daily purpose on days when they fulfill culturally valued family and academic roles, such as caregiving responsibilities, whereas days with fewer role-based activities are associated with lower purpose and poorer well-being (Kiang & Fuligni, 2010; Kiang, 2011). Although this evidence focuses on youth, it illustrates how culturally embedded social roles can generate purpose through everyday experiences, a process that may extend into adulthood. At the same time, racialized experiences may undermine purpose in later life. For example, Hill et al. (2021) found that although Native Hawaiian and Japanese American adults experienced higher levels of everyday discrimination than White adults, patterns of purpose and health outcomes diverged across groups: Native Hawaiians reported relatively high purpose and moderate sleep quality despite frequent discrimination, whereas Japanese Americans reported lower purpose and poorer sleep outcomes. These findings suggest that purpose may function as a resilience factor for some Asian and Pacific Islander populations, but not uniformly across groups. Although sense of purpose has been shown to differ across age and racial groups (Kiang & Fuligni, 2010; Ko et al., 2016; Mann et al., 2019), little is known about whether the protective association between purpose and physical health varies across these groups, particularly in the context of daily health experiences. Moreover, much of the existing literature relies on single-time assessments of purpose and health, limiting insight into how purpose relates to health as it naturally unfolds in daily life. Thus, the present study uses data from the Daily Experiences and Health study to test whether individuals with higher purpose report fewer daily physical symptoms; and whether this association differs (1) across younger and older adults and (2) between White and Asian/Pacific Islander participants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.014
Scholarly communication0.0090.002
Open science0.0100.011
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Science FrameworkFrench-language works237,207