MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7116775738 · doi:10.1002/mdc3.70486

Validation of the German Version of the Movement Disorder Society Non‐Motor Scale ( <scp>MDS</scp> ‐ <scp>NMS</scp> )

2025· article· en· W7116775738 sur OpenAlexaff
Jonas Bendig, Anika Frank, Adrianna Lipska‐Dieck, Kristof Wunderlich, David Geißler‐Lösch, Isabel Wurster, Roswitha Kemmner, Kathrin Brockmann, Sheng Luo, C G Goetz, Glenn T. Stebbins, Pablo Martínez‐Martín, Tiago Mestre, Álvaro Sánchez‐Ferro, Monica M. Kurtis, Michelle H.S. Tosin, Roberta Balestrino, Chi‐Ying Lin, Carmen Gasca‐Salas, H. Reichmann, Bjoern H. Falkenburger

Notice bibliographique

RevueMovement Disorders Clinical Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Établissements canadiensOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesNational Institutes of HealthEberhard Karls Universität TübingenGemeinsame BundesausschussDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEVER Neuro PharmaBritish Heart FoundationParkinson's FoundationH. Lundbeck A/SRush UniversityBoston Scientific CorporationF. Hoffmann-La RocheComunidad de MadridTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesBiogenInternational Parkinson and Movement Disorder SocietyEisaiUniversity of OxfordCHDI FoundationU.S. Department of DefenseSanofiNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
Mots-clésGermanCohortRating scaleMovement disordersScale (ratio)MoodMinor (academic)CLARITY

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Parkinson's disease (PD) is increasingly recognized for its complex spectrum of non-motor symptoms (NMS). Given their impact, accurate assessment of NMS are essential for optimal PD care. To this end, the initial Non-Motor Symptom Scale (NMSS)1 was revised into the The International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society—Non-Motor Rating Scale (MDS-NMS).2, 3 Here, we translated the MDS-NS into German and validate this German version in adherence to the methodology of the official MDS clinical outcome assessment program. The validation cohort consisted of 300 patients with PD from two sites in Germany (Dresden: n = 209; Tübingen: n = 91). Methods and demographic characteristics of the study participants are listed in the supplement (Table S1). Cognitive Pretesting was performed with ten patients and three movement disorder specialists. Expert feedback resulted in minor changes in wording to improve clarity of the translation. Most patients found the scale relevant, comprehensive and easy to understand (nine out of ten for each category). Four out of ten patients found questions related to the sexual domain embarrassing, while five out of ten patients found some questions (related to sexual domain, mood or depression) from the scale difficult to answer. Overall, no major problems were identified and the final translation with minor language changes was approved as official working document for the validation phase. Our study cohort consisted of patients with mainly mild to moderate PD, but nevertheless, we found a high prevalence of NMS as previously reported by others.4 Symptoms in the sleep and wakefulness subscale showed the highest prevalence (95.0%) and symptoms on the psychosis subscale displayed the lowest prevalence (30.3%). At least one non-motor symptom was present in every patient of our cohort (Table S2). Table 1 displays the confirmatory factor analysis results for each of the 10 subscales of the German MDS-NMS, which satisfied our pre-specified criterion of CFI ≥ 0.90 $$ \ge 0.90 $$ in comparison with the English-language factor structure. The exploratory factor analysis results revealed a single factor for all domains of the MDS-NMS and the Non-Motor Fluctuations (NMF) subscale (based on scree plots, Fig. S1). Factor loadings for individual items can be found in Table S3. Limitations of our study include a possible selection bias of specialized movement disorder centers in which participants were recruited and the reliance on only two recruitment sites in Germany. Finally, the cross-sectional design of our study did not allow the assessment of metrics like test–retest reliability, which should be investigated in longitudinal follow-up studies. Based on the results of this validation study, the German version of the MDS-NMS met the criteria to be considered an MDS-approved Official Translation and provides a successful cross-cultural adaptation of the MDS-NMS. (1) Research Project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; (2) Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; (3) Manuscript Preparation: A. Writing of the First Draft, B. Review and Critique; (4) Responsibility: A. Integrity of the Data, B. Accuracy of the Data Analysis. J.B.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 3A, 4A, 4B A.F.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 3A, 4A, 4B A.L.D.: 1B, 1C, 3B K.W.: 1B, 1C, 3B D.G.L.: 1B, 1C, 3B I.W.: 1B, 1C, 3B R.K.: 1B, 1C, 3B K.B.: 1B, 1C, 3B S.L.: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2C, 3B, 4A, 4B C.G.G.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B G.T.S.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B P.M.M.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B T.A.M.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B A.S.F.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B M.M.K.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B M.H.S.T.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B R.B.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B C.Y.R.L.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B C.G.S.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B H.R.: 1A, 1B, 3B B.H.F.: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2C, 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B We acknowledge the grant support from the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS) to implement the project and the work of the MDS COA Translation Steering Committee throughout the development process, review of the translation, cognitive pretesting, validation of data, and writing of the manuscript. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Ethical Compliance Statement: The Ethics Committee of Dresden and Tübingen approved the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants by a study investigator. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this work is consistent with those guidelines. Financial Disclosures and Conflicts of Interest: This work was supported by a grant from the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS). The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest relevant to this work. Financial Disclosures and Conflicts of Interest: JB received a fellowship from the German Research foundation as well as the Joachim Herz Foundation and a salary from Columbia University. AF received a fellowship from the German Research foundation and a salary from Columbia University. KB performed Consulting work with honoraria for F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Vanqua Bio, and the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research. She received grant funding from the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research (“LRRK2 Kinase Activity,” “Influence of Inflammatory Profiles on PD Phenotype and Progression,” “Prevent Dementia in GBA-associated PD”), from the University of Tübingen (“Endophenotyping of GBA-PD”), from the German Society for Parkinson DPG, from the Health Forum Baden Wuerttemberg (“Predictive Diagnostic of immune-associated diseases for personalized medicine”), from the Else Kröner Fresenius Stiftung (“ClinBrain”), and from the German Research Foundation DFG (“CORO-TREND”). She serves on the advisory board for F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. She received speaker honoraria from Abbvie, Lundbeck, UCB and Zambon. SL received consulting or advisory board membership with honoraria from the National Institutes of Health, IQVIA, BIAL Biotech, Parkinson Study Group, Huntington Study Group, International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society; grants/research from the National Institutes of Health, CHDI Foundation/Management, Inc., International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society, Parkinson's Foundation, and Michael J. Fox Foundation; and a salary from Duke University. CGG received honoraria for consulting or advisory board membership with Theranova. Research conducted by Dr. Goetz at Rush University Medical Center was supported by funding awarded to the center from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), UO1 funding from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), grants from the Department of Defense, and the Michael J. Fox Foundation. Additionally, Dr. Goetz received honoraria as faculty and program management stipends from the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society, and received royalties from Elsevier Publishers, Wolters Kluwer, Oxford University Press, and Springer Science. Salary compensation was received from Rush University Medical Center. ASF received grants or contracts from ERA-NET Horizon 2020 program JPCOFUND2 (reference number HESOCARE-329-073), MDS (eDiary project), and Instituto de Salud Carlos III (reference number P122/01177); consulting fees from AbbVie, Boston Scientific, Esteve, Orion Pharma, Prim; and Roche and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, Bayer, Esteve, MDS Society, EAN, Novartis, Monitor, Organon, Roche, SEN, Stada, Teva, and Zambon. He received a salary from Leuko Labs and Hospital 12 de Octubre and royalties from patents #: 12216112, 20250013841, 12131217, 20240277243, 11963750, 20240085399, 20240085399, 20230032932, 11445980, 20220254024, 11244452, 20210374963, 10959676, 20210038159, 20200060622, 10506979, 20190139221, 20180235548, 9984277, D1044020, 9867573, 20160148038, 20150272504. He owned stock from Leuko Labs. MMK served on the advisory board and performed consulting work with honoraria for Bial. She received honoraria from Eisai, Bial, Esteve and the Spanish Neurological Society. She received grant funding from EU Horizon 2023–2027 and Quironsalud 2023–2024. Ger salary was provided by Neurología Aplicada SLP. CGS performed consulting work with honoraria for Instituto de Salud Carlos III and received grant funding from the Community of Madrid Grant. She received Funding to attend a scientific meeting from Esteve. MHST received a salary from Rush University and is received honoraria for participation in a working group supported by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. RB received a travel grant from Lusofarmaco. BHF has received advisory and consultancy honoraria from AbbVie, Aleva, Amylyx, Bial, Desitin, Ever Pharma, Stadapharm, Zambon and is an investigator on studies funded by AbbVie, Bial, Biogen, Centogene, CHDI, Denali, DFG, G-BA, Lundbeck, MDS, MJFF, PD Neurotechnology, Sanofi, Takeda, Teva, UCB. He received a salary from The University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden. The remaining authors have no additional disclosures to report. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Data S1 Supporting Information. Supplementary Table 1 Demographic data of the German cohort. Supplementary Table 2 Prevalence and scores for non-motor symptoms. Supplementary Table 3 Exploratory factor structure for subscales of the German MDS-NMS. Supplementary Figure 1 Scree plots of Item A-M and NMF of MDS-NMS. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,144
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,918

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,332
Écart entre enseignants0,318 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMovement Disorders Clinical PracticeMême sujetParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207