MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116775738 · doi:10.1002/mdc3.70486

Validation of the German Version of the Movement Disorder Society Non‐Motor Scale ( <scp>MDS</scp> ‐ <scp>NMS</scp> )

2025· article· en· W7116775738 on OpenAlexaff
Jonas Bendig, Anika Frank, Adrianna Lipska‐Dieck, Kristof Wunderlich, David Geißler‐Lösch, Isabel Wurster, Roswitha Kemmner, Kathrin Brockmann, Sheng Luo, C G Goetz, Glenn T. Stebbins, Pablo Martínez‐Martín, Tiago Mestre, Álvaro Sánchez‐Ferro, Monica M. Kurtis, Michelle H.S. Tosin, Roberta Balestrino, Chi‐Ying Lin, Carmen Gasca‐Salas, H. Reichmann, Bjoern H. Falkenburger

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders Clinical Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Institutes of HealthEberhard Karls Universität TübingenGemeinsame BundesausschussDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEVER Neuro PharmaBritish Heart FoundationParkinson's FoundationH. Lundbeck A/SRush UniversityBoston Scientific CorporationF. Hoffmann-La RocheComunidad de MadridTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesBiogenInternational Parkinson and Movement Disorder SocietyEisaiUniversity of OxfordCHDI FoundationU.S. Department of DefenseSanofiNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsGermanCohortRating scaleMovement disordersScale (ratio)MoodMinor (academic)CLARITY

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson's disease (PD) is increasingly recognized for its complex spectrum of non-motor symptoms (NMS). Given their impact, accurate assessment of NMS are essential for optimal PD care. To this end, the initial Non-Motor Symptom Scale (NMSS)1 was revised into the The International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society—Non-Motor Rating Scale (MDS-NMS).2, 3 Here, we translated the MDS-NS into German and validate this German version in adherence to the methodology of the official MDS clinical outcome assessment program. The validation cohort consisted of 300 patients with PD from two sites in Germany (Dresden: n = 209; Tübingen: n = 91). Methods and demographic characteristics of the study participants are listed in the supplement (Table S1). Cognitive Pretesting was performed with ten patients and three movement disorder specialists. Expert feedback resulted in minor changes in wording to improve clarity of the translation. Most patients found the scale relevant, comprehensive and easy to understand (nine out of ten for each category). Four out of ten patients found questions related to the sexual domain embarrassing, while five out of ten patients found some questions (related to sexual domain, mood or depression) from the scale difficult to answer. Overall, no major problems were identified and the final translation with minor language changes was approved as official working document for the validation phase. Our study cohort consisted of patients with mainly mild to moderate PD, but nevertheless, we found a high prevalence of NMS as previously reported by others.4 Symptoms in the sleep and wakefulness subscale showed the highest prevalence (95.0%) and symptoms on the psychosis subscale displayed the lowest prevalence (30.3%). At least one non-motor symptom was present in every patient of our cohort (Table S2). Table 1 displays the confirmatory factor analysis results for each of the 10 subscales of the German MDS-NMS, which satisfied our pre-specified criterion of CFI ≥ 0.90 $$ \ge 0.90 $$ in comparison with the English-language factor structure. The exploratory factor analysis results revealed a single factor for all domains of the MDS-NMS and the Non-Motor Fluctuations (NMF) subscale (based on scree plots, Fig. S1). Factor loadings for individual items can be found in Table S3. Limitations of our study include a possible selection bias of specialized movement disorder centers in which participants were recruited and the reliance on only two recruitment sites in Germany. Finally, the cross-sectional design of our study did not allow the assessment of metrics like test–retest reliability, which should be investigated in longitudinal follow-up studies. Based on the results of this validation study, the German version of the MDS-NMS met the criteria to be considered an MDS-approved Official Translation and provides a successful cross-cultural adaptation of the MDS-NMS. (1) Research Project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; (2) Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; (3) Manuscript Preparation: A. Writing of the First Draft, B. Review and Critique; (4) Responsibility: A. Integrity of the Data, B. Accuracy of the Data Analysis. J.B.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 3A, 4A, 4B A.F.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 3A, 4A, 4B A.L.D.: 1B, 1C, 3B K.W.: 1B, 1C, 3B D.G.L.: 1B, 1C, 3B I.W.: 1B, 1C, 3B R.K.: 1B, 1C, 3B K.B.: 1B, 1C, 3B S.L.: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2C, 3B, 4A, 4B C.G.G.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B G.T.S.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B P.M.M.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B T.A.M.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B A.S.F.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B M.M.K.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B M.H.S.T.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B R.B.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B C.Y.R.L.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B C.G.S.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B H.R.: 1A, 1B, 3B B.H.F.: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2C, 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B We acknowledge the grant support from the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS) to implement the project and the work of the MDS COA Translation Steering Committee throughout the development process, review of the translation, cognitive pretesting, validation of data, and writing of the manuscript. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Ethical Compliance Statement: The Ethics Committee of Dresden and Tübingen approved the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants by a study investigator. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this work is consistent with those guidelines. Financial Disclosures and Conflicts of Interest: This work was supported by a grant from the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS). The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest relevant to this work. Financial Disclosures and Conflicts of Interest: JB received a fellowship from the German Research foundation as well as the Joachim Herz Foundation and a salary from Columbia University. AF received a fellowship from the German Research foundation and a salary from Columbia University. KB performed Consulting work with honoraria for F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Vanqua Bio, and the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research. She received grant funding from the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research (“LRRK2 Kinase Activity,” “Influence of Inflammatory Profiles on PD Phenotype and Progression,” “Prevent Dementia in GBA-associated PD”), from the University of Tübingen (“Endophenotyping of GBA-PD”), from the German Society for Parkinson DPG, from the Health Forum Baden Wuerttemberg (“Predictive Diagnostic of immune-associated diseases for personalized medicine”), from the Else Kröner Fresenius Stiftung (“ClinBrain”), and from the German Research Foundation DFG (“CORO-TREND”). She serves on the advisory board for F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. She received speaker honoraria from Abbvie, Lundbeck, UCB and Zambon. SL received consulting or advisory board membership with honoraria from the National Institutes of Health, IQVIA, BIAL Biotech, Parkinson Study Group, Huntington Study Group, International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society; grants/research from the National Institutes of Health, CHDI Foundation/Management, Inc., International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society, Parkinson's Foundation, and Michael J. Fox Foundation; and a salary from Duke University. CGG received honoraria for consulting or advisory board membership with Theranova. Research conducted by Dr. Goetz at Rush University Medical Center was supported by funding awarded to the center from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), UO1 funding from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), grants from the Department of Defense, and the Michael J. Fox Foundation. Additionally, Dr. Goetz received honoraria as faculty and program management stipends from the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society, and received royalties from Elsevier Publishers, Wolters Kluwer, Oxford University Press, and Springer Science. Salary compensation was received from Rush University Medical Center. ASF received grants or contracts from ERA-NET Horizon 2020 program JPCOFUND2 (reference number HESOCARE-329-073), MDS (eDiary project), and Instituto de Salud Carlos III (reference number P122/01177); consulting fees from AbbVie, Boston Scientific, Esteve, Orion Pharma, Prim; and Roche and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, Bayer, Esteve, MDS Society, EAN, Novartis, Monitor, Organon, Roche, SEN, Stada, Teva, and Zambon. He received a salary from Leuko Labs and Hospital 12 de Octubre and royalties from patents #: 12216112, 20250013841, 12131217, 20240277243, 11963750, 20240085399, 20240085399, 20230032932, 11445980, 20220254024, 11244452, 20210374963, 10959676, 20210038159, 20200060622, 10506979, 20190139221, 20180235548, 9984277, D1044020, 9867573, 20160148038, 20150272504. He owned stock from Leuko Labs. MMK served on the advisory board and performed consulting work with honoraria for Bial. She received honoraria from Eisai, Bial, Esteve and the Spanish Neurological Society. She received grant funding from EU Horizon 2023–2027 and Quironsalud 2023–2024. Ger salary was provided by Neurología Aplicada SLP. CGS performed consulting work with honoraria for Instituto de Salud Carlos III and received grant funding from the Community of Madrid Grant. She received Funding to attend a scientific meeting from Esteve. MHST received a salary from Rush University and is received honoraria for participation in a working group supported by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. RB received a travel grant from Lusofarmaco. BHF has received advisory and consultancy honoraria from AbbVie, Aleva, Amylyx, Bial, Desitin, Ever Pharma, Stadapharm, Zambon and is an investigator on studies funded by AbbVie, Bial, Biogen, Centogene, CHDI, Denali, DFG, G-BA, Lundbeck, MDS, MJFF, PD Neurotechnology, Sanofi, Takeda, Teva, UCB. He received a salary from The University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden. The remaining authors have no additional disclosures to report. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Data S1 Supporting Information. Supplementary Table 1 Demographic data of the German cohort. Supplementary Table 2 Prevalence and scores for non-motor symptoms. Supplementary Table 3 Exploratory factor structure for subscales of the German MDS-NMS. Supplementary Figure 1 Scree plots of Item A-M and NMF of MDS-NMS. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement Disorders Clinical PracticeSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207