Beyond Fear: How Everyday Interactions Defuse Xenophobia in South African Townships
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Scholarship and research following the onset of the widespread 2008 xenophobic attacks in South Africa have largely been negative, presenting a picture of perpetual hatred, communities falling into abysmal fear, livelihoods and lives being lost, and the relative peace and harmony enjoyed by locals and foreigners since South Africa gained its independence in 1994 being lost forever. Such rhetoric has been entrenched by the continued rise in cases of civil unrest, perpetuated by individuals and groups who champion selfish interests at the expense of foreigners. Yet, naturally, society has shown the ability to transform negative experiences into positive outcomes, characterized by deeper social ties, co-existence, and mutually beneficial oneness in diversity. Based on ethnographic research conducted to examine everyday social interaction among migrants from the Great Lakes Region and South Africans in Cape Town, this paper calls for a re-examination of the roots and results of xenophobia, showing, through the examples of Joe Slovo and Phoenix Townships in Cape Town, how positive social movements can be borne out of negative situations. The paper argues, with evidence from the two townships, that what may have changed since 2008 is the nature of the social fabric that is interaction-based, that which holds a people either together or asunder, and not their economic outlook. The paper delves into the controversy surrounding the social menace of xenophobia, which, although widely written about, none have been wholesomely able to account for. Perhaps the answer to why there has been this ugly scar on South Africa lies in the examination not of what has been, but in areas seemingly unimportant. The question is: why has xenophobia been continuously experienced in some areas more than others, yet poverty is as endemic and perpetual an element in South African townships? Part of the answer lies in the examination of social relations between African migrants and locals in areas least hit by the social cancer. Based on evidence, xenophobia in South Africa is argued to be more a social than an economic consequence, whose trajectory is changeable once the right social tools are employed. These positive results can also serve as models for social reconstruction if a sustainable solution to social ills such as xenophobia can be found.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».