Message du rédacteur en chef : Après une année de « version numérique seulement » pour la revue Acoustique Canadienne
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Since my last editorial, Canadian Acoustics has continued its steady evolution as both a scientific journal and a community platform, marked by important structural, editorial, and operational developments. One of the most significant milestones of the last 12 months has been our transition to an electronic-only publication format. This decision was communicated to our members through multiple channels, including a special editorial in December 2023, announcements at the October 2023 Annual General Assembly, an online notice in April 2024, and a detailed editorial accompanying the June 2024 issue. The response from our readership has been overwhelmingly positive: we received many supportive messages, only two members expressed concerns, and no comments have been raised to date by advertisers or indirect subscribers. This feedback reinforces our confidence that the transition aligns well with the expectations and reading habits of our community, while also supporting sustainability and operational efficiency. To support this electronic-only format, we have also invested in improving our digital dissemination tools. A new plugin for the Open Journal Systems platform was developed by Benjamin Pye, a full-stack programmer intern, to generate responsive HTML emails presenting issue tables of contents in a reader-friendly format. In keeping with our commitment to openness and community contribution, the plugin’s source code has been made publicly available (https://github.com/critias-etsmtl-ca/pkp-emailIssueToc), allowing other journals to benefit from this development and further strengthening the open-source ecosystem around scholarly publishing. The past year has also marked an important renewal of our Editorial Board. Since October 2023, several sections have welcomed new editors, ensuring both continuity and renewal across the journal’s core domains. Prof. Olivier Doutres (Université du Québec à Montréal – ÉTS) has assumed responsibility for the Hearing Conservation section, succeeding the late Alberto Behar; Prof. Anderson Raymundo Avila (INRS-EMT, Canada) now oversees Signal Processing and Numerical Methods; Prof. Marlène Sanjosé (ÉTS) has taken on the Aeroacoustics section, replacing Dr. Anant Grewal (National Research Council of Canada); Roderick Mackenzie (SoftdB, Canada) now leads the Consulting section following the passing of Tim Kelsall; and Dr. Sebastian Ghinet (National Research Council of Canada) has taken over Engineering Acoustics and Noise Control from Prof. Joana Rocha (Carleton University). Together with the ongoing commitment of the full editorial team, these transitions reinforce our capacity to serve authors, readers, and the broader acoustics community with rigor, continuity, and renewed energy. We have also had to address immediate operational challenges. With our Journal Manager, Dr. Cécile LeCocq, unexpectedly unavailable for LaTeX galley production, we implemented a temporary but necessary “rubber-stamp” approach to formally mark and release accepted manuscripts. While this is far from our preferred model, it ensures continuity of publication and preserves the integrity of our release schedule while we work toward a more sustainable production pipeline, notably through our upcoming partenership with Érudit consortium, that I’ll disclose in near future. In parallel, we have clarified internal policies surrounding indirect subscribers and updated our editorial guidance on managing conflicts of interest in peer review. Authors may now flag specific, well-supported concerns regarding reviewer selection, and Section Editors will assess these requests with transparent and consistent criteria. The goal is not to shift decision-making to authors but to ensure procedural fairness and preserve confidence in the impartiality of the review process. Taken together, these developments reflect a journal that continues to adapt thoughtfully to changing expectations while remaining firmly anchored in rigor, transparency, and service to its community. I would like to thank our authors, reviewers, editors, and readers for their continued engagement and trust, which remain the foundation of Canadian Acoustics.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,027 | 0,144 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,018 | 0,011 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,022 | 0,032 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,046 | 0,039 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».