Short form-36, Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale/UNIFESP– EPM, Health Assessment Questionnaire-20 and pain in patients after skin graft for venous ulcer
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objective: To assess quality of life, self-esteem, functional capacity and pain in patients with venous ulcer after skin graft. Methods: Clinical, multicenter, analytical, prospective, comparative, controlled and non-randomized study. This study was carried out in the plastic surgery outpatient clinic of Hospital São Paulo and in the Wound Outpatient clinic at Conjunto Hospitalar de Sorocaba. The case series was formed by 50 patients in the Control Group (CG) and 50 patients in the Study Group (SG) both with diagnosis of venous ulcer and indication for skin graft. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the Universidade Federal de São Paulo, under authorization #: 0945/08. Data collection was carried out from July 2008 and December 2010. In the CG, data collection was carried out at the time patients were included in the study, and then 30, 90 and 180 days after the first collection. In the SG, the first collection was carried out in the preoperative period and then 30, 90 and 180 days after skin graft. All patients of the CG were operated on after 180 days. Inclusion criteria were: being over 18 years old and having a diagnosis of venous ulcer with referral for skin coverage with skin graft. Exclusion criteria were: Skin lesions that were not completely characterized as venous ulcer, patients with clinical conditions that contraindicated surgery, and patients that had already undergone skin graft. The instruments used for data collection were: Short Form- 36, the Rosenberg self-esteem scale/UNIFESP–EPM, the Health Assessment Questionnaire-20 (HAQ-20), the Numeric Pain Scale, and the Mc Gill pain questionnaire. For statistical analysis, we have used Students’ t test, Kruskal-Wallis test and the Chi-square test of independence. It was fixed in 0.05 or 5% (p ≤ 0.05). Outcomes: In the initial assessment of patients with venous ulcer, the SF-36 scores were low, with a mean score of 18.10 in the CG, and 32.34 in the SG. One month after skin graft was carried out, patients in the SG presented higher scores in the SF-36 (71.38) compared to the CG (18.42). After 90 and 180 days there was also an increase in the scores of the SG compared to the CG (p=0.0001). Mean scores in the HAQ-20 was 2.42 in the CG and 2.65 in the SG, and in the SG there was an improvement in the scores 90 and 180 days after skin graft was carried out (p=0.0001).As for the Rosenberg self-esteem scale/UNIFESP–EPM, in the inclusion of patients in the study, the mean score was 25.50 in the CG, and 25.86 in the SG, and after 90 days and 180 days the SG presented better score compared to the CG (p=0.0001). As for pain assessment using the Numeric Scale and the McGill pain questionnaire, both groups of patients presented pain during the first data collection, however, in the SG 90 and 180 days after surgery, patients presented less pain (p=0.0001). Conclusion: Patients with venous ulcers, that underwent skin graft presented improvement in the quality of life, self-esteem, functional capacity and less pain.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».