Análises genética e genômica de características longitudinais em gado de leite
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Traits with multiple phenotypic values taking over time are termed longitudinal traits, e.g., milk production. Despite of the great importance of analyzing these traits taking into account their time- dependent nature, the majority of studies on longitudinal traits have converted the repeated records for each animal into a single measure (e.g., average over all time points or accumulated yield), which does not allow any inference about the trait over time. Therefore, the general objective of this thesis was to better understand the genetic and genomic aspects of longitudinal traits over time in dairy cattle. Simulated and real datasets (from Brazilian Gyr and Canadian Ayrshire, Holstein and Jersey dairy cattle breeds) were used in this research. First, breeding values were predicted (EBVs) using a multiple-trait random regression model (RRM) combining Legendre orthogonal polynomials and linear B-splines to simultaneously describe the first and second lactation of Gyr Dairy cattle. Subsequently, genomic predictions, genome-wide association analyses were performed for milk, fat and protein yields, and somatic cell score from the first three lactations of the Canadian dairy breeds using different methodologies, including two-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP). The performance of the most used deregression methods for non-longitudinal traits for the deregression of cows’ and bulls’ EBVs for using in genomic evaluation of longitudinal traits was also evaluated, using RRMs and the Canadian Jersey data. In addition, the impact of including information from bulls and their daughters in the training population of multiple-step genomic evaluations was investigated using a simulated population. Combining different functions to model the fixed and random effects in multiple-trait RRMs seems to be a good alternative (based on the goodness-of-fit of model, breeding values and variance component estimates) for genetic modeling of lactation curves in dairy cattle, as shown here for Gyr cattle. Deregressed longitudinal EBVs obtained using well established methods of deregression for non-longitudinal traits can be used for genomic prediction of longitudinal traits. Furthermore, removing the parent average and the genotyped daughters’ average from the deregressed EBVs can increase the reliability of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs). In Holstein, the reliability of GEBVs predicted using the RRM was in general lower than the reliability from the accumulated 305-d model when using the two-step GBLUP method, however, the RRM provided less biased GEBVs compared to the accumulated 305-d model. The use of single-step GBLUP to predict GEBVs for longitudinal traits based on RRMs increased the reliability and reduced bias of GEBVs compared to traditional parent average, in the Canadian Ayrshire, Holstein, and Jersey breeds. Different genomic regions associated with the analyzed traits were identified for different lactation stages, supporting differential gene control across lactation stages. For all Canadian breeds, the pattern of the effect of several single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with the analyzed longitudinal traits changed over time. In addition, prospective candidate genes with potential different patterns of expression over time were identified in putative chromosomal regions. The findings described in this thesis will contribute to advance the knowledge on the genomic expression and prediction of breeding values for longitudinal traits.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».