MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7120637482

Análises genética e genômica de características longitudinais em gado de leite

2018· dissertation· en· W7120637482 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hinayah Rojas de Oliveira

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelection (genetic algorithm)TraitPopulationDairy cattleGenomic selectionQuantitative trait locusAnimal breedingBest linear unbiased predictionLinear regression
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traits with multiple phenotypic values taking over time are termed longitudinal traits, e.g., milk production. Despite of the great importance of analyzing these traits taking into account their time- dependent nature, the majority of studies on longitudinal traits have converted the repeated records for each animal into a single measure (e.g., average over all time points or accumulated yield), which does not allow any inference about the trait over time. Therefore, the general objective of this thesis was to better understand the genetic and genomic aspects of longitudinal traits over time in dairy cattle. Simulated and real datasets (from Brazilian Gyr and Canadian Ayrshire, Holstein and Jersey dairy cattle breeds) were used in this research. First, breeding values were predicted (EBVs) using a multiple-trait random regression model (RRM) combining Legendre orthogonal polynomials and linear B-splines to simultaneously describe the first and second lactation of Gyr Dairy cattle. Subsequently, genomic predictions, genome-wide association analyses were performed for milk, fat and protein yields, and somatic cell score from the first three lactations of the Canadian dairy breeds using different methodologies, including two-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP). The performance of the most used deregression methods for non-longitudinal traits for the deregression of cows’ and bulls’ EBVs for using in genomic evaluation of longitudinal traits was also evaluated, using RRMs and the Canadian Jersey data. In addition, the impact of including information from bulls and their daughters in the training population of multiple-step genomic evaluations was investigated using a simulated population. Combining different functions to model the fixed and random effects in multiple-trait RRMs seems to be a good alternative (based on the goodness-of-fit of model, breeding values and variance component estimates) for genetic modeling of lactation curves in dairy cattle, as shown here for Gyr cattle. Deregressed longitudinal EBVs obtained using well established methods of deregression for non-longitudinal traits can be used for genomic prediction of longitudinal traits. Furthermore, removing the parent average and the genotyped daughters’ average from the deregressed EBVs can increase the reliability of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs). In Holstein, the reliability of GEBVs predicted using the RRM was in general lower than the reliability from the accumulated 305-d model when using the two-step GBLUP method, however, the RRM provided less biased GEBVs compared to the accumulated 305-d model. The use of single-step GBLUP to predict GEBVs for longitudinal traits based on RRMs increased the reliability and reduced bias of GEBVs compared to traditional parent average, in the Canadian Ayrshire, Holstein, and Jersey breeds. Different genomic regions associated with the analyzed traits were identified for different lactation stages, supporting differential gene control across lactation stages. For all Canadian breeds, the pattern of the effect of several single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with the analyzed longitudinal traits changed over time. In addition, prospective candidate genes with potential different patterns of expression over time were identified in putative chromosomal regions. The findings described in this thesis will contribute to advance the knowledge on the genomic expression and prediction of breeding values for longitudinal traits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)→Same topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock→French-language works237,207→