MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7120875365

Nursing home care of the babies born with very low birth weight and their family.

2011· dissertation· pt· W7120875365 sur OpenAlex
Anelize Helena Sassá

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTrakya University's Institutional Open Access System (Trakya University) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languept
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInfant Development and Preterm Care
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLow birth weightMeaning (existential)Qualitative researchCourageSocial supportDescriptive statisticsContent analysisDescriptive research
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The fragile condition of babies born with very low birth weight (BBVLBW) at their home interferes with their recovery and development process. They require more specialized care than that provided to babies born with adequate weight and/or in good health conditions. After discharge from hospital, these children are highly vulnerable due to their preterm birth and very low birth weight. Their families are also vulnerable since they face new factors, or rather, taking care of the preterm child at home requires some kind of life adaptation. Each family is unique and faces the process in its own way. It is important to know and to understand their behavior, their feelings, and the meaning of such experience. Current analysis tries to understand the experience of families experiences in BBVLBW home care during the first six months after hospital discharge. Research included a descriptive qualitative approach that employed the methodological reference Convergent Care Research Approach. Study comprised nine families whose BBVLBW were assisted over the first six months after hospital discharge. Data were collected between June 2010 and August 2011 through informal and semi-structured interviews and by participants observation conducted during home visits to the families. Data were analyzed according to content analysis proposed by Bardin. The Calgary Family Assessment Model was also employed to describe the family structure and social support given to the families. Results showed that taking care of preterm children requires family strength and courage to overcome insecurities arising from baby hospitalization and fragility. The mother os possibility of staying with her BBVLBW during hospitalization, although representing an important period of approximation between mother and her baby and providing experience on how to deal with the child at home, was not enough to ensure confidence in taking care of her preterm baby by herself. In this context, the difficulties faced by the family, which constituted the focus of nursing care, mainly consisted of explanations on doubts with regard to preterm babies peculiarities, breastfeeding management and BBVLBW feeding, coupled to family caretaking and home organization for the newly-born child. The presence of a support network by the entire family, friends, community and health care professional services benefitted the family's equilibrium and mitigated the difficulties experienced during the care process. As the fears and anxieties related to care and conditions of BBVLBW were overcome by the families, they felt safer to transfer the demands of baby care from hospital staff to themselves. Nursing care at home benefitted families adaptation and allowed them to be assisted according to needs at home. It also reassured and strengthened them to overcome difficult times and to experience a new phase within the family life cycle.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,461
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,003
Science ouverte0,0040,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle