MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7120875365

Nursing home care of the babies born with very low birth weight and their family.

2011· dissertation· pt· W7120875365 on OpenAlex
Anelize Helena Sassá

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTrakya University's Institutional Open Access System (Trakya University) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicInfant Development and Preterm Care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow birth weightMeaning (existential)Qualitative researchCourageSocial supportDescriptive statisticsContent analysisDescriptive research
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fragile condition of babies born with very low birth weight (BBVLBW) at their home interferes with their recovery and development process. They require more specialized care than that provided to babies born with adequate weight and/or in good health conditions. After discharge from hospital, these children are highly vulnerable due to their preterm birth and very low birth weight. Their families are also vulnerable since they face new factors, or rather, taking care of the preterm child at home requires some kind of life adaptation. Each family is unique and faces the process in its own way. It is important to know and to understand their behavior, their feelings, and the meaning of such experience. Current analysis tries to understand the experience of families experiences in BBVLBW home care during the first six months after hospital discharge. Research included a descriptive qualitative approach that employed the methodological reference Convergent Care Research Approach. Study comprised nine families whose BBVLBW were assisted over the first six months after hospital discharge. Data were collected between June 2010 and August 2011 through informal and semi-structured interviews and by participants observation conducted during home visits to the families. Data were analyzed according to content analysis proposed by Bardin. The Calgary Family Assessment Model was also employed to describe the family structure and social support given to the families. Results showed that taking care of preterm children requires family strength and courage to overcome insecurities arising from baby hospitalization and fragility. The mother os possibility of staying with her BBVLBW during hospitalization, although representing an important period of approximation between mother and her baby and providing experience on how to deal with the child at home, was not enough to ensure confidence in taking care of her preterm baby by herself. In this context, the difficulties faced by the family, which constituted the focus of nursing care, mainly consisted of explanations on doubts with regard to preterm babies peculiarities, breastfeeding management and BBVLBW feeding, coupled to family caretaking and home organization for the newly-born child. The presence of a support network by the entire family, friends, community and health care professional services benefitted the family's equilibrium and mitigated the difficulties experienced during the care process. As the fears and anxieties related to care and conditions of BBVLBW were overcome by the families, they felt safer to transfer the demands of baby care from hospital staff to themselves. Nursing care at home benefitted families adaptation and allowed them to be assisted according to needs at home. It also reassured and strengthened them to overcome difficult times and to experience a new phase within the family life cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it