Nursing home care of the babies born with very low birth weight and their family.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fragile condition of babies born with very low birth weight (BBVLBW) at their home interferes with their recovery and development process. They require more specialized care than that provided to babies born with adequate weight and/or in good health conditions. After discharge from hospital, these children are highly vulnerable due to their preterm birth and very low birth weight. Their families are also vulnerable since they face new factors, or rather, taking care of the preterm child at home requires some kind of life adaptation. Each family is unique and faces the process in its own way. It is important to know and to understand their behavior, their feelings, and the meaning of such experience. Current analysis tries to understand the experience of families experiences in BBVLBW home care during the first six months after hospital discharge. Research included a descriptive qualitative approach that employed the methodological reference Convergent Care Research Approach. Study comprised nine families whose BBVLBW were assisted over the first six months after hospital discharge. Data were collected between June 2010 and August 2011 through informal and semi-structured interviews and by participants observation conducted during home visits to the families. Data were analyzed according to content analysis proposed by Bardin. The Calgary Family Assessment Model was also employed to describe the family structure and social support given to the families. Results showed that taking care of preterm children requires family strength and courage to overcome insecurities arising from baby hospitalization and fragility. The mother os possibility of staying with her BBVLBW during hospitalization, although representing an important period of approximation between mother and her baby and providing experience on how to deal with the child at home, was not enough to ensure confidence in taking care of her preterm baby by herself. In this context, the difficulties faced by the family, which constituted the focus of nursing care, mainly consisted of explanations on doubts with regard to preterm babies peculiarities, breastfeeding management and BBVLBW feeding, coupled to family caretaking and home organization for the newly-born child. The presence of a support network by the entire family, friends, community and health care professional services benefitted the family's equilibrium and mitigated the difficulties experienced during the care process. As the fears and anxieties related to care and conditions of BBVLBW were overcome by the families, they felt safer to transfer the demands of baby care from hospital staff to themselves. Nursing care at home benefitted families adaptation and allowed them to be assisted according to needs at home. It also reassured and strengthened them to overcome difficult times and to experience a new phase within the family life cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".