MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7124958797 · doi:10.14339/sto-avt-384-2

High and Ultra High Temperature Ceramic Matrix Composites for Hypersonic Systems

2025· article· W7124958797 sur OpenAlexaff
Mario De Stefano Fumo, Diletta Sciti, Luca Zoli, Lorenzo Cavalli

Notice bibliographique

RevueNATO Journal of Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineMathematics
ThématiqueGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Établissements canadiensPetro-Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHypersonic speedAerodynamic heatingAerodynamicsHypersonic flightSupersonic speedSpace Shuttle thermal protection systemMach numberThermal

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Although the first hypersonic flight was achieved over 70 years ago, there has been increasing interest from a broader audience due to modern engineering advances that are poised to revolutionize defensive capabilities, sub-orbital travel, and rapid access to space. When vehicle speeds pass supersonic conditions and enter the hypersonic regime (conventionally fixed to Mach 5) the physics of external aerodynamic flows become dominated by aerothermal heating rather than aerodynamic forces. Aerodynamic compression and friction in stagnation and off-stagnation points create high enthalpy gas dynamics that impart additional physical phenomena from the energy exchange of a superheated atmosphere. This superheated atmosphere results in high heat fluxes (some orders of magnitude greater than the 1.4 kW/m2 from the sun); extreme thermal gradients (changing from -170°C to 3,000°C across distances of order 1 cm); high stagnation pressures (∼105–107 Pa); and destructive plasma from gas ionization, which can strongly accelerate materials oxidation. All of these formidable phenomena must be accommodated by materials in the principal subsystems of a hypersonic vehicle: aeroshell/primary structure, leading edges, control surfaces, acreage thermal protection, propulsion, and guidance systems. Developing engineering materials for hypersonic vehicles has become the focus of cutting-edge research and these materials are presently rate-limiting steps for the resilience of structures during operation in extreme environments, adding complexity and cost to material system development. For these reasons, the performance of future defence platforms is highly reliant upon the emergence of materials able to withstand repeated operation at very high temperatures (>1,500°C) while subjected to high stresses from aerothermal and manoeuvre loads, severe thermal gradients, extreme thermal shocks, and particle impacts while also enduring exposure to high speed, sometimes ionized, reactive gas flows. Examples include components for the hot sections of turbine or scram jet propulsion systems, rocket nozzles, hypersonic leading edges, thermal protection systems of re-entry vehicles and aerothermal structures of high-speed interceptors. During the last thirty years in Europe, C/SiC solutions have been developed during different re-entry spacecraft projects (X-38, EXPERT, IXV) with the operative requirement of a single mission at temperatures up to 1700° C. Another more recent solution is the material class of the Ultra High Temperature Ceramics Matrix Composites (UHTCMC). These materials are mainly based on matrices of metal borides reinforced with carbon fibres and aim to reach operating temperatures above 2,000°C. Recent works demonstrated their potential for use as thermal protections and hot structures for hypersonic vehicles and re-entry systems. The design of high temperature ceramic matrix composites (CMC) and UHTCMC structures for reusable systems will solve a series of significant critical issues due to the complex behaviour of the orthotropic materials characterized by multiple modes of damage often interacting. Furthermore, the degradation of the mechanical characteristics of the material, subject to mechanical and thermal cycling conditions in space environment and hypersonic flight in oxidizing environment. For these reasons, the design approach is presently based on very conservative criteria and, in parallel, extensive experimental activities are needed to certify materials and components. This report presents numerical modelling supported by materials characterization and experiments conducted in a relevant environment. In particular, modelling activities have been carried out with the objectives of: providing suitable macroscale models describing the mechanical behaviour of the involved CMCs and confirming an understanding of the mechanical, thermal and chemical phenomena at work during operation. Thanks to plasma wind tunnel facilities available at the Italian Aerospace Research Centre, testing in a relevant environment in dedicated facilities allowed closing of the circle by means of verifying the initial requirements with the identified materials solutions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,013

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNATO Journal of Science and TechnologyMême sujetGas Dynamics and Kinetic TheoryTravaux en français237 207