MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7124958797 · doi:10.14339/sto-avt-384-2

High and Ultra High Temperature Ceramic Matrix Composites for Hypersonic Systems

2025· article· W7124958797 on OpenAlexaff
Mario De Stefano Fumo, Diletta Sciti, Luca Zoli, Lorenzo Cavalli

Bibliographic record

VenueNATO Journal of Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypersonic speedAerodynamic heatingAerodynamicsHypersonic flightSupersonic speedSpace Shuttle thermal protection systemMach numberThermal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the first hypersonic flight was achieved over 70 years ago, there has been increasing interest from a broader audience due to modern engineering advances that are poised to revolutionize defensive capabilities, sub-orbital travel, and rapid access to space. When vehicle speeds pass supersonic conditions and enter the hypersonic regime (conventionally fixed to Mach 5) the physics of external aerodynamic flows become dominated by aerothermal heating rather than aerodynamic forces. Aerodynamic compression and friction in stagnation and off-stagnation points create high enthalpy gas dynamics that impart additional physical phenomena from the energy exchange of a superheated atmosphere. This superheated atmosphere results in high heat fluxes (some orders of magnitude greater than the 1.4 kW/m2 from the sun); extreme thermal gradients (changing from -170°C to 3,000°C across distances of order 1 cm); high stagnation pressures (∼105–107 Pa); and destructive plasma from gas ionization, which can strongly accelerate materials oxidation. All of these formidable phenomena must be accommodated by materials in the principal subsystems of a hypersonic vehicle: aeroshell/primary structure, leading edges, control surfaces, acreage thermal protection, propulsion, and guidance systems. Developing engineering materials for hypersonic vehicles has become the focus of cutting-edge research and these materials are presently rate-limiting steps for the resilience of structures during operation in extreme environments, adding complexity and cost to material system development. For these reasons, the performance of future defence platforms is highly reliant upon the emergence of materials able to withstand repeated operation at very high temperatures (>1,500°C) while subjected to high stresses from aerothermal and manoeuvre loads, severe thermal gradients, extreme thermal shocks, and particle impacts while also enduring exposure to high speed, sometimes ionized, reactive gas flows. Examples include components for the hot sections of turbine or scram jet propulsion systems, rocket nozzles, hypersonic leading edges, thermal protection systems of re-entry vehicles and aerothermal structures of high-speed interceptors. During the last thirty years in Europe, C/SiC solutions have been developed during different re-entry spacecraft projects (X-38, EXPERT, IXV) with the operative requirement of a single mission at temperatures up to 1700° C. Another more recent solution is the material class of the Ultra High Temperature Ceramics Matrix Composites (UHTCMC). These materials are mainly based on matrices of metal borides reinforced with carbon fibres and aim to reach operating temperatures above 2,000°C. Recent works demonstrated their potential for use as thermal protections and hot structures for hypersonic vehicles and re-entry systems. The design of high temperature ceramic matrix composites (CMC) and UHTCMC structures for reusable systems will solve a series of significant critical issues due to the complex behaviour of the orthotropic materials characterized by multiple modes of damage often interacting. Furthermore, the degradation of the mechanical characteristics of the material, subject to mechanical and thermal cycling conditions in space environment and hypersonic flight in oxidizing environment. For these reasons, the design approach is presently based on very conservative criteria and, in parallel, extensive experimental activities are needed to certify materials and components. This report presents numerical modelling supported by materials characterization and experiments conducted in a relevant environment. In particular, modelling activities have been carried out with the objectives of: providing suitable macroscale models describing the mechanical behaviour of the involved CMCs and confirming an understanding of the mechanical, thermal and chemical phenomena at work during operation. Thanks to plasma wind tunnel facilities available at the Italian Aerospace Research Centre, testing in a relevant environment in dedicated facilities allowed closing of the circle by means of verifying the initial requirements with the identified materials solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNATO Journal of Science and TechnologySame topicGas Dynamics and Kinetic TheoryFrench-language works237,207