Adaptive Scheduling and Managing Resources in Changing Industrial Settings: Deep Reinforcement Learning for the Internet of Things
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) has been increasingly introduced to industrial applications, as it facilitates real-time process monitoring, machine control, and device networks of things. In the rapidly changing, complex resources managing and scheduling process, it is becoming increasingly difficult to use the traditional techniques to meet the requirements of industrial environments. These environments exhibit dynamic workloads, unexpected task interruption and/or cancellation, energy limitation and diverse device capabilities for which necessitate intelligent decision-making frameworks that can adapt with time. In this paper, we investigate the application of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), as a promising solution to tackle these challenges, for intelligent scheduling and resource provisioning in industrial loT (1IoT) systems. Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) integrates the decision-making nature of Reinforcement Learning (RL) and the representative capacity of Deep Neural Network (DNN) models and enables agents to acquire optimal policies from the input data streams in high dimensionality such as those occurring in industrial settings. With MDP modelling for resource allocation problem, DRL agents are trained to allocate resources in a dynamic manner, taking into account the current state in real time, including the availability of machines, the emergency of tasks, the power of devices, and the network situation. DRL algorithms including DQN, PPO and A2e are tested in different simulation tasks of industrial loT simulations for the optimization of various metrics such as latency, throughput, energy efficiency and fault tolerance. The simulation is set up as a smart factory with a mix of loT devices that are handling production, monitoring and logistics. DRL agents can be trained to reason about decisions in terms of job scheduling, task offloading, and energy budgeting, while meeting fluctuating system conditions. Reward functions are handcrafted to strike a balance between mandates such as performance, efficiency, reliability, and so on. Experimental studies demonstrate that DRL has great advantage over traditional fixed and rule-based scheduling policies especially when there exist certain and rapid-varying environment information. This work not only proves the effectiveness of DRL in improving operational intelligence in industrial loT systems, but also opens up a path to highly scalable and adaptive decision-making in Industry 4.0. It also helps to address the deployment of autonomous systems that are capable of learning and continuously adapting to increase production and reduce the consumption of resources as well as the associated down time of operations. The implications are significant, and pave the way towards self-organizing, more robust industrial ecosystems.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».