Adaptive Scheduling and Managing Resources in Changing Industrial Settings: Deep Reinforcement Learning for the Internet of Things
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) has been increasingly introduced to industrial applications, as it facilitates real-time process monitoring, machine control, and device networks of things. In the rapidly changing, complex resources managing and scheduling process, it is becoming increasingly difficult to use the traditional techniques to meet the requirements of industrial environments. These environments exhibit dynamic workloads, unexpected task interruption and/or cancellation, energy limitation and diverse device capabilities for which necessitate intelligent decision-making frameworks that can adapt with time. In this paper, we investigate the application of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), as a promising solution to tackle these challenges, for intelligent scheduling and resource provisioning in industrial loT (1IoT) systems. Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) integrates the decision-making nature of Reinforcement Learning (RL) and the representative capacity of Deep Neural Network (DNN) models and enables agents to acquire optimal policies from the input data streams in high dimensionality such as those occurring in industrial settings. With MDP modelling for resource allocation problem, DRL agents are trained to allocate resources in a dynamic manner, taking into account the current state in real time, including the availability of machines, the emergency of tasks, the power of devices, and the network situation. DRL algorithms including DQN, PPO and A2e are tested in different simulation tasks of industrial loT simulations for the optimization of various metrics such as latency, throughput, energy efficiency and fault tolerance. The simulation is set up as a smart factory with a mix of loT devices that are handling production, monitoring and logistics. DRL agents can be trained to reason about decisions in terms of job scheduling, task offloading, and energy budgeting, while meeting fluctuating system conditions. Reward functions are handcrafted to strike a balance between mandates such as performance, efficiency, reliability, and so on. Experimental studies demonstrate that DRL has great advantage over traditional fixed and rule-based scheduling policies especially when there exist certain and rapid-varying environment information. This work not only proves the effectiveness of DRL in improving operational intelligence in industrial loT systems, but also opens up a path to highly scalable and adaptive decision-making in Industry 4.0. It also helps to address the deployment of autonomous systems that are capable of learning and continuously adapting to increase production and reduce the consumption of resources as well as the associated down time of operations. The implications are significant, and pave the way towards self-organizing, more robust industrial ecosystems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".