MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7130361624 · doi:10.7202/1123401ar

The Artistic Access Residency Creazioni Accessibili

2025· article· en· W7130361624 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePerformance Matters · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueSubtitles and Audiovisual Media
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDanceChoreographyDramaturgyPerforming artsContemporary danceThe artsMentorshipPower (physics)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This article focuses on the challenges that the integration of audio description (hereafter AD) into contemporary choreography provides, by analyzing two artistic processes and their applied solutions. The examined examples described here took place in the residency Creazioni Accessibili (Accessible Creations) in Rome/Italy. This residency features Giuseppe Comuniello (blind performer and choreographer) and Camilla Guarino (dramaturg) as mentors, is curated by Flavia Dalila D’Amico, and is produced by the National Centre of Dance Production Orbita Spellbound in Rome. The aim is to discover both emotional and affective ways to make contemporary dance performances accessible for blind and visually impaired audiences by engaging with AD as a means to provide layers of meaningful and multisensory access to the dramaturgy and poetics of a specific show. Every year, the curator and mentors select an artistic project through an open call, offering the possibility for a choreographer to discover suitable access strategies for his/her dance work. During the work phases, the residency includes both mixed vision mentorship and feedback sessions with blind and visually impaired spectators, using co-design as a method to test the AD and reflect the concrete desires of access-deserving people. Co-design means collaborating with people with specific lived experience to create something new, like a service, product, or research project. It’s not just about getting feedback; it’s about sharing decision-making power and working together to shape the final product, which in this case is the access dramaturgy of a contemporary dance work. So every year an artist can co-design access strategies with blind mentors and test the results with blind community members. This article combines Flavia Dalila D’Amico’s lens as scholar and residency curator with Giuseppe Comuniello and Camilla Guarino’s notes as mentors and dance artists. These three authors describe and discuss how different the solutions were tried out in the first two years of the residency. Plain Language Abstract (adapted by Kelsie Acton with Daniel Foulds) This essay talks about making audio description part of dance. Audio description is when someone tells Blind or visually impaired people what the dance looks like. Creazioni Accessibili (Accessible Creations) is an arts program in Rome. This essay looks at how two dances were made at Creazioni Accessibili. Flavia Dalila D’Amico organized Creazioni Accessibili. Guiseppe Comuniello is a blind performer and choreographer. Camilla Guarino is a dramaturg. A dramaturg helps the artists make art that has meaning and makes people feel. People might see, hear, smell, or feel performance. So dramaturgy is about making meaning and feeling through the senses. They all worked on these dances. The goal was to make Blind and visually impaired people feel the dance, emotionally and through descriptions of what dancers see when moving and what other people see when watching them move. The artists tried out different ways of doing audio description for dance. During the process, Blind people told the artists if the audio description worked. This means that Blind people shared their knowledge with artists so they can make something new together. In this essay, Flavia Dalila D’Amico, Guiseppe Comuniello, and Camilla Guarino write together about the different types of audio description they have tested. Some of the types of audio description they tested were describing only the dancers’ movement, describing what the people watching did as well as the dancers, describing what the movement made them think of, and having two people describe the same movement.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,257
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,295
Écart entre enseignants0,265 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle