MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7130361624 · doi:10.7202/1123401ar

The Artistic Access Residency Creazioni Accessibili

2025· article· en· W7130361624 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Giuseppe Comuniello, Flavia Dalila D’Amico, Camilla Guarino

Bibliographic record

VenuePerformance Matters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSubtitles and Audiovisual Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceChoreographyDramaturgyPerforming artsContemporary danceThe artsMentorshipPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article focuses on the challenges that the integration of audio description (hereafter AD) into contemporary choreography provides, by analyzing two artistic processes and their applied solutions. The examined examples described here took place in the residency Creazioni Accessibili (Accessible Creations) in Rome/Italy. This residency features Giuseppe Comuniello (blind performer and choreographer) and Camilla Guarino (dramaturg) as mentors, is curated by Flavia Dalila D’Amico, and is produced by the National Centre of Dance Production Orbita Spellbound in Rome. The aim is to discover both emotional and affective ways to make contemporary dance performances accessible for blind and visually impaired audiences by engaging with AD as a means to provide layers of meaningful and multisensory access to the dramaturgy and poetics of a specific show. Every year, the curator and mentors select an artistic project through an open call, offering the possibility for a choreographer to discover suitable access strategies for his/her dance work. During the work phases, the residency includes both mixed vision mentorship and feedback sessions with blind and visually impaired spectators, using co-design as a method to test the AD and reflect the concrete desires of access-deserving people. Co-design means collaborating with people with specific lived experience to create something new, like a service, product, or research project. It’s not just about getting feedback; it’s about sharing decision-making power and working together to shape the final product, which in this case is the access dramaturgy of a contemporary dance work. So every year an artist can co-design access strategies with blind mentors and test the results with blind community members. This article combines Flavia Dalila D’Amico’s lens as scholar and residency curator with Giuseppe Comuniello and Camilla Guarino’s notes as mentors and dance artists. These three authors describe and discuss how different the solutions were tried out in the first two years of the residency. Plain Language Abstract (adapted by Kelsie Acton with Daniel Foulds) This essay talks about making audio description part of dance. Audio description is when someone tells Blind or visually impaired people what the dance looks like. Creazioni Accessibili (Accessible Creations) is an arts program in Rome. This essay looks at how two dances were made at Creazioni Accessibili. Flavia Dalila D’Amico organized Creazioni Accessibili. Guiseppe Comuniello is a blind performer and choreographer. Camilla Guarino is a dramaturg. A dramaturg helps the artists make art that has meaning and makes people feel. People might see, hear, smell, or feel performance. So dramaturgy is about making meaning and feeling through the senses. They all worked on these dances. The goal was to make Blind and visually impaired people feel the dance, emotionally and through descriptions of what dancers see when moving and what other people see when watching them move. The artists tried out different ways of doing audio description for dance. During the process, Blind people told the artists if the audio description worked. This means that Blind people shared their knowledge with artists so they can make something new together. In this essay, Flavia Dalila D’Amico, Guiseppe Comuniello, and Camilla Guarino write together about the different types of audio description they have tested. Some of the types of audio description they tested were describing only the dancers’ movement, describing what the people watching did as well as the dancers, describing what the movement made them think of, and having two people describe the same movement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerformance MattersSame topicSubtitles and Audiovisual MediaFrench-language works237,207