MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7131070327 · doi:10.1115/imece2025-166629

Using Non-Contact Anti-Corrosion Under Insulation Materials to Increase Efficiency of Acoustic Insulation for Pipes

2025· article· W7131070327 sur OpenAlexaff
Richard J. Pamley, Mark Swift, Ahmad Rk Rana, Graham Brigham

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Établissements canadiensArmacell (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSoundproofingPipe insulationMoistureInsulation systemThermal insulationCladding (metalworking)Corrosion

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Insulation for process pipework is required for thermal, acoustic and fire protection, either to maintain fluid temperature, reduce noise emissions or protect process systems from fire. However, corrosion under insulation is a key concern for plant operators. Moisture can penetrate the insulation cladding and some fibrous materials can allow that moisture to wick down to the pipe wall and allow corrosion to occur. Although there are insulation materials that perform well to prevent this wicking effect, there is a growing consensus for using non-contact insulation systems to either raise the insulation from the pipe wall and/or raise the external jacket from the insulation material. For thermal requirements, these non-contact systems have some benefits to help reduce the thickness of the overall system. However, there are significant benefits in the reduction of insulation system thickness for acoustic insulation systems. Acoustic insulation for pipes, valves and flanges is governed by ISO15665. The standard outlines a series of classifications for the acoustic insertion loss performance of insulation systems. These system classifications are often used in the design and operational requirements for industrial process plants. There is often a requirement for these plants to increase the lifetime of, and to reduce the thickness and weight of these insulation systems. A revision of the standard was implemented in 2023. Within the revision, emphasis was placed on selecting appropriate materials for an acoustic system where Corrosion Under Insulation (CUI) was a concern. The revision of the standard also emphasizes the requirement to test an acoustic insulation system to meet a defined acoustic insertion loss classification. Non-metallic standoff membranes offer a simple but highly effective method for providing non-contact options to reduce corrosion under insulation risk through removal of insulation from pipe walls and cladding respectively. Open and closed cell flexible elastomeric foams (FEF) and aerogel blanket insulation materials are installed in varying constructions to provide superior sound attenuation for pipework, valves and flanges. These insulation materials also provide inherent protection from liquid and vapor migration and are often used to provide corrosion under insulation protection for contact approved systems. Using PTFE or PVC non-contact systems with conjunction with the FEF and aerogel insulation materials, a range of non-contact, acoustic insulation systems were developed to meet the acoustic insertion loss classification requirements of ISO15665. Emphasis was made on minimizing the thickness of the systems. Acoustic insulation on pipework is required to reduce the passage of airborne sound through a combination of acoustic absorption and mass barrier effects. The insulation is also required to minimize the transfer of vibrational energy from the pipe wall to the external cladding through vibration isolation and damping. The combination of these material factors helps to define the sound attenuation that can be achieved by the acoustic insulation system at each frequency. Currently there is no recorded study emphasising the effect of acoustic performance of pipework acoustic insertion loss for standoff systems incorporated into acoustic insulation of pipes. It was however considered that the incorporation of the annular spaces provided by the non-contact standoffs could be advantageous for purposes of reducing sound propagation from the pipe wall through the insulation system. This paper presents a summary of the work done to enhance acoustic insulation systems for pipework to meet the classification requirements of ISO15665, with minimum possible thickness along with offering protection against CUI and stress corrosion cracking (SCC) that the standoff systems can provide. These hybrid systems meet the demanding acoustic, environmental and cost-effective solutions required by the industrial process industry.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,481
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,266
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesTravaux en français237 207