MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131070327 · doi:10.1115/imece2025-166629

Using Non-Contact Anti-Corrosion Under Insulation Materials to Increase Efficiency of Acoustic Insulation for Pipes

2025· article· W7131070327 on OpenAlexaff
Richard J. Pamley, Mark Swift, Ahmad Rk Rana, Graham Brigham

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsArmacell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoundproofingPipe insulationMoistureInsulation systemThermal insulationCladding (metalworking)Corrosion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Insulation for process pipework is required for thermal, acoustic and fire protection, either to maintain fluid temperature, reduce noise emissions or protect process systems from fire. However, corrosion under insulation is a key concern for plant operators. Moisture can penetrate the insulation cladding and some fibrous materials can allow that moisture to wick down to the pipe wall and allow corrosion to occur. Although there are insulation materials that perform well to prevent this wicking effect, there is a growing consensus for using non-contact insulation systems to either raise the insulation from the pipe wall and/or raise the external jacket from the insulation material. For thermal requirements, these non-contact systems have some benefits to help reduce the thickness of the overall system. However, there are significant benefits in the reduction of insulation system thickness for acoustic insulation systems. Acoustic insulation for pipes, valves and flanges is governed by ISO15665. The standard outlines a series of classifications for the acoustic insertion loss performance of insulation systems. These system classifications are often used in the design and operational requirements for industrial process plants. There is often a requirement for these plants to increase the lifetime of, and to reduce the thickness and weight of these insulation systems. A revision of the standard was implemented in 2023. Within the revision, emphasis was placed on selecting appropriate materials for an acoustic system where Corrosion Under Insulation (CUI) was a concern. The revision of the standard also emphasizes the requirement to test an acoustic insulation system to meet a defined acoustic insertion loss classification. Non-metallic standoff membranes offer a simple but highly effective method for providing non-contact options to reduce corrosion under insulation risk through removal of insulation from pipe walls and cladding respectively. Open and closed cell flexible elastomeric foams (FEF) and aerogel blanket insulation materials are installed in varying constructions to provide superior sound attenuation for pipework, valves and flanges. These insulation materials also provide inherent protection from liquid and vapor migration and are often used to provide corrosion under insulation protection for contact approved systems. Using PTFE or PVC non-contact systems with conjunction with the FEF and aerogel insulation materials, a range of non-contact, acoustic insulation systems were developed to meet the acoustic insertion loss classification requirements of ISO15665. Emphasis was made on minimizing the thickness of the systems. Acoustic insulation on pipework is required to reduce the passage of airborne sound through a combination of acoustic absorption and mass barrier effects. The insulation is also required to minimize the transfer of vibrational energy from the pipe wall to the external cladding through vibration isolation and damping. The combination of these material factors helps to define the sound attenuation that can be achieved by the acoustic insulation system at each frequency. Currently there is no recorded study emphasising the effect of acoustic performance of pipework acoustic insertion loss for standoff systems incorporated into acoustic insulation of pipes. It was however considered that the incorporation of the annular spaces provided by the non-contact standoffs could be advantageous for purposes of reducing sound propagation from the pipe wall through the insulation system. This paper presents a summary of the work done to enhance acoustic insulation systems for pipework to meet the classification requirements of ISO15665, with minimum possible thickness along with offering protection against CUI and stress corrosion cracking (SCC) that the standoff systems can provide. These hybrid systems meet the demanding acoustic, environmental and cost-effective solutions required by the industrial process industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207